Re: "thousand" - "chilia" why is it said not to be declinable?

From: Carl W. Conrad (
Date: Sun Nov 07 1999 - 16:57:46 EST

At 7:33 AM -0600 11/7/99, Michael Lyda wrote:
>The word in the new testament for thousand is said not to be declinable.
>Why? Does any one have any insight on this or suggestions of where to
>search for info?

I'm wondering where you derived that information. I find eleven instances
of CILIOI,AI,A in the GNT, of which 8 are neuter plural CILIA in agreement
with ETH ('years')--2 in 2 Peter 3:8, the other 6 in Revelation; two more
are acc. pl. fem. CILIAS in agreement with hHMERAS, and one genitive plural
neuter CILIWN in agreement with STADIWN (and also the numeral hEXAKOSIWN

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649

B-Greek home page:
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: []
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
To subscribe, send a message to

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:44 EDT