From: Joe A. Friberg (JoeFriberg@email.msn.com)
Date: Wed Nov 17 1999 - 20:15:46 EST
I would answer no for the following 2 reasons:
1. In 5.8, there may be a trade-off between which group has the harps and
which as the bowls of incense: I suggest the 24 elders have the harps and
the creatures the bowls, forming a chiasmus within this sentence. Harps
require 2 hands, and large bowls do also. This arrangement suggests that it
is the elders who are singing in 5.9, not the beasts.
2. Even if the beasts are singing along, from general linguistic evidence I
would argue that pronouns are flexible enough to be used with some
imprecision. That is, pronouns never cut up the space of all possible
participants with as many divisions as various circumstances call for. In
this case, there is no pronoun for we in this group but not those over
there. Further, those over there could potentially join in the chorus,
sympathizing with the sentiments of the elders without compromising their
For example, I recall singing Ps 115.1-3 set to music in my church years
ago; these verses are replete with "us" and "our", but we had no problem
singing the words, recognizing their historical application to Israel, and
identifying with their sentiments of praise to God.
----- Original Message -----
From: Roe <email@example.com>
> "(5:8) the four beasts and four and twenty elders ... (5:9) ... sung a
> new song, saying, Thou ... hast redeemed *US* to God ..."
> Greetings B-Greeks,
> Metzger concedes that the weight of textual evidence for Revelation 5:9
> supports a reading meaning that the 24 elders sing that *they* have been
> redeemed to God, because the overwhelming majority of mss read either
> EGORASAS TWi QEWi hHMAS or hHMAS EGORASAS TWi QEWi. A reading not
> supported by external principles of analysis, EGORASAS TWi QEWi, is
> favored apparently for reasons of internal textual constancy, with an
> object of EK PASHS FULHS KAI FLWSSHS KAI LAOU KAI EQNOUS.
> My question:
> Would a reading with hHMAS EGORASAS TWi QEWi (or EGORASAS TWi QEWi
> hHMAS) necessarily indicate that the 24 elders *and* the four beasts
> have been redeemed? Or, could it (also?) be interpreted to mean that
> only the 24 elders have been redeemed?
> D. W. Roe
> Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:45 EDT