From: Ben Crick (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 23 1999 - 10:49:32 EST
On Mon 22 Nov 1999 (20:05:54), firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> "Know ye not brethren, (for I speak to them that know
> the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as
> long as HE liveth" (vs. 1). I understand that "HE" was
> supplied by the translators. Several commentators,
> etc. that I have read behind seem to suggest that "it"
> could have been used in place of "HE." I tend to
> agree. What do you think?
The first word in verse 1, )H\, refers back to OU GAR ESTE hUPO NOMON
ALLA hUPO CARIN (6:14), picked up by TO DE CARISMA TOU QEOU in 6:23.
hO NOMOS (7:1) does not necessarily refer to the Mosaic Law only; the
Romans would also apply it to the Lex Romana. This is the Law of Marriage,
not the Law of Moses, being instanced here.
TOU ANQROPOU does not mean the husband hO ANHR in verse 2; it means men and
women generally, and covers all legal contracts, not just marriage. These
cease to be of any effect after the death of one or other of the parties
concerned. The legal contract ceases; but not the Law itself.
hOSON CRONON ZHi would mean hOSON CRONON hO ANQRWPOS ZHi. It would be a
redundant tautology, adding nothing to the argument, if it were taken
to mean hOSON CRONON hO NOMOS ZHi. Compare ZWNTOS TOU ANDROS in verse 3.
The Law makes a married woman an adulteress if she marry another husband
GENHTAI ANDRI hETERWi unless her first husband has died (EAN DE APOQANHi
hO ANHR). Compare Hosea 3:3 LXX, OUDE MH GENHi ANDRI, for the expression
GINOMAI ANDRI, 'get married'; also Deuteronomy 24:4, Ruth 1:12 LXX.
In verse 4 it does not say the Law is dead; it is the ANDRES ADELFOI who
are *dead to the Law* in Christ, who died our death penalty under the Law.
Now being 'dead' to the Law of Moses, we are free to be 'married' to the
Law of Christ, and bring forth the 'fruit' of that union.
> In verse 1 the KJV translators make it say that the
> MAN ("HE") is in subjection to the law so long as the
> man ("HE") lives. But the context shows that when the
> law ceases to be in force, the man is released from
> obligation to the law. Greenfield, in his "Notes on
> the Greek New Testament," translates it: "The law hath
> dominion over a man so long as it is in force, and no
> longer." Albert Barnes and Adam Clarke also make
> similar observations in their commentaries.
Those are excellent commentaries; but maybe you should also consult
something a little more recent? Douglas J Moo is very good, if you
prefer a 'conservative' one. There are many more.
-- Revd Ben Crick, BA CF <email@example.com> 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK) http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:45 EDT