Re: Philippians 2:6

From: Ilvgrammta@aol.com
Date: Thu Dec 23 1999 - 11:18:44 EST


In a message dated 99-12-22 21:56:33 EST, alexali@surf.net.au writes:

<< Then, besides the sense of EN MORFHi QEOU, there is the sense of the
participle, hUPARCWN. I wonder if some translators have understood this as
having a causal force (because he was / through being), and others as having
a concessive force (although he was / despite being). (I do not mean to
imply by the terms 'causal' or 'concessive' anything more than that these are
useful for this discussion in English of the Greek text; see Smyth #2060,
and Carl's comments a couple of days ago on the the term "connective" or
"pertinentive" with reference to the genitive.) >>

Professor Gerald Hawthorne understands hUPARCWN in a causal sense. His
translation is, "precisely because he was in the form of God he reckoned
equality with God not as a matter of getting but giving" (Hawthorne [1983] ).

Richard R. Melick Jr. (NA Commentary) critiques Hawthorne's idea as follows:
"Hawthorne, Philippians, 85, takes the participle causally: "Precisely
because he was in the form of God." The idea is attractive, but the text
speaks of giving up what one has, and the concessive emphasizes that more"
(Melick [1991] ).

Moises Silva also construes the participle concessively, writing: "The NASB
is justified in bringing out the concessive force of the participle (contra
Meyer, Hwth.), and that in turn sheds light on the second part of v. 6"
(Silva [1988] ).

Lastly, Richard A. Young also construes hUPARCWN in a concessive manner. See
his intermediate grammar.

Edgar Foster

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:51 EDT