From: George Goolde (goolde@mtnempire.net)
Date: Thu Dec 30 1999 - 16:17:53 EST
<x-flowed>Dear B-Greekers,
I am preparing a student notebook which includes an exegesis of 1 Cor
15:1-5. In studying 1 Cor 15:2 I have some exegetically challenging
questions. Can you help?
The text reads:
DI' OU KAI SWZESQH TINI LOGW EUHGGELISAMHN UMIN, EI KATEXETE, EKTOS EI MH
EIKH EPISTEUSATE.
My questions are these:
1. What is the significance of EI KATEXETE ?
2. Why the verb tense change between KATEXETE and EPISTEUSATE ?
3. I understand the pleonasm of EKTOS EI MH but I am surprised that MH
rather than OU is used with an indicative verb. Any ideas why?
4. Do you take EKTOS EI MH as a negated 1CC ?
5. What is the structural relationship between EI KATEXETE and EKTOS EI MH
EPISTEUSATE
I would appreciate answers to any and all of these questions. Thanks in
advance.
George
George A. Goolde
Professor, Bible and Theology
Southern California Bible College & Seminary
El Cajon, California
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:52 EDT