Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 18:17:49 EST
In a message dated 2/17/2000 2:47:10 PM Central Daylight Time, email@example.com
As to whether or not something is a formal rendering, I think the bigger
question is: Was your source text formal or colloquial? It is best to try to
retain the original genre, mood, rhetorical impact in translation.
Otherwise, we change the meaning of the original during the translation
process, since mood, level of formality, and rhetorical impact are all part
of the original meaning. For those source passages where the level of
language and mood is formal, it's good to have the translation be formal.
Where the source text is informal or colloquial, accuracy is best preserved
by keeping that same level of language in the target language translation.
This may retain the parallelism, however, I think it is somewhat inaccurate.
Double-talk generally has a connotation of nonsense. What is sought is
something to signify dishonesty.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:57 EDT