Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 09:06:10 EST
In a message dated 2/22/2000 8:12:42 AM Central Daylight Time,
<< At 8:01 PM -0800 2/20/00, John Wilking wrote:
>Can we read PEFANERWTAI as the missing verb in Romans 3:22 and thus read
>as DIKAIOSUNN DE QEOU PEFANERWTAI...EIS PANTAS TOUS PISTEUONTAS?
"NUNI DE CWRIS NOMOU DIKAIOSUNH QEOU PEFANERWTAI MARTUROUMENH hUPO TOU
NOMOU KAI TWN PROFHTWN, DIKAIOSUNH DE QEOU KAI PISTEWS IHSOU CRISTOU EIS
PANTAS TOUS PISTEUONTAS..."
(Forgive me if there are errors in my transliteration. This is the first
time I have posted and I am not exactly excellent at this transliteration
Don't worry about that. I hate transliteration too. I think it would be a
great idea if we would all agree on an common font such as SPIonic (It's
free!) for Greek words. Usually I forget the transliteration and simply look
up the passage.
I'm wondering why it would be necessary to supply a verb here. It seems to
DIKAIOSUNH DE QEOU . . .
is in apposition with
DIKAIOSUNH QEOU PEFANERWTAI
in the previous verse. Thus it would read "God's righteous has appeared . .
.[which righteousness of God?] -- God's righeousness through faith concerning
Jesus Christ to all who believe."
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:58 EDT