From: Edward Hobbs (EHOBBS@WELLESLEY.EDU)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 11:08:15 EST
From: IN%"email@example.com" "clayton stirling bartholomew" 20-MAR-2000 20:50:21.18
To: IN%"EHOBBS@WELLESLEY.EDU" "Edward Hobbs"
Subj: RE: Causal meaning of EIS in NT?
Received: from cliff.wellesley.edu ([220.127.116.11])
by WELLESLEY.EDU (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3952)
with ESMTP id <01JN9PKJJGGM8X2B5Q@WELLESLEY.EDU> for ehobbs@WELLESLEY.EDU;
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:50:20 EST
Received: from mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net
by cliff.wellesley.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25693 for
<EHOBBS@wellesley.edu>; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:52:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [18.104.22.168] by mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122)
with ESMTP id <20000321015018.MBAA24417.firstname.lastname@example.org> for
<EHOBBS@wellesley.edu>; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 01:50:18 +0000
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:49:43 -0800
From: clayton stirling bartholomew <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Causal meaning of EIS in NT?
To: Edward Hobbs <EHOBBS@WELLESLEY.EDU>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)
on 03/20/00 2:45 PM, Edward Hobbs wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I suspected that there was something about
Mantey's "Causal EIS" that didn't meet the eye so to speak.
BTW, I got your reply in private but didn't see it on b-greek.
Did you want to send it to b-greek.
> Clay's response to my forwarded post from the archives is quite right.
> But it does not bear on Mantey's "Causal EIS". Mantey means by that
> term, that EIS means "because of"---"a baptism of repentance BECAUSE OF
> the remission of sins." I.e., AFTER your sins are remitted, you THEN get
> baptized by John.
> "Causal EIS" is an ambiguous term; Clay's sense is a correct application of
> the term, but Mantey's is ungrounded in any Greek texts known to me.
> Edward Hobbs
> ---------------Clay wrote-------->>>>>>>>
>> What do the B-Greekers think about the preposition EIS and its
>> possible causal meaning in the New Testament Greek? There was some
>> debate about the matter (pro and contra) at the beginning of the
>> fifties in the Journal of Biblical Literature. There are some
>> seemingly clear examples of a causal sense of EIS in the NT: e. g. not
>> only EIS TI in Mt 14:31 and Mk 15:34, but also EIS TOUTO in Mk 1:38.
>> But N. Turner in Moulton's Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. III,
>> p. 266s., is skeptical.
>> Ladislav Tich=FD
>> Faculty of theology
>> Palack=FD University
>> Czech Republic
> Edwards post on this prompted me to do some looking into the question. Louw
> and Nida (89.48) have this to say about EIS & EN as a markers of causation:
> EIS & EN : markers of result, with the probable implication of a preceding
> process =8B =8Cwith the result that, so that as a result, to cause.=B9
> .. . .snip. . .
> It would be possible to interpret EIS =8A AGW in Ro 2:4 as being purely an
> expression of cause since AGW (see 36.1) also involves a component of
> cause, and therefore one may interpret the expression EIS METNOIAN SE AGEI
> as =8Cit causes you to repent.=B9 In either case, however, EIS marks a
> event or state . . .
> This is not really a counter example since AGW may include the notion of
> causation and EIS may simply (only) mark a resulting event or state. Howeve=
> it is another aspect of this question worth looking at.
> -- =20
> Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
> Three Tree Point
> P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:41:02 EDT