From: Bill Ross (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 02 2000 - 15:19:37 EDT
...but the original ceremony clearly implied a washing. And the church
ordinance ought to preserve this idea. See Acts 22:16:
"And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins,
calling on his name."
I don't think baptim is properly understood as a washing (see 1 Peter 3:21).
But grammatically speaking...
EPIKALESAMENOS is either defining the washing or both the baptism and the
Acts 22:16 KAI NUN TI MELLEIS ANASTAS BAPTISAI **KAI** APOLOUSAI TAS
AMARTIAS SOU EPIKALESAMENOS TO ONOMA AUTOU
1 Peter 3 21 O KAI UMAS ANTITUPON NUN SWZEI BAPTISMA OU SARKOS APOQESIS
RUPOU ALLA SUNEIDHSEWS AGAQHS EPERWTHMA EIS QEON DI ANASTASEWS IHSOU CRISTOU
1 Pet 3:21 (KJV)
"The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the
putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience
toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:"
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:24 EDT