From: Daniel P. Bailey (DanPBailey@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:25:44 EDT
I'm having trouble parsing the form hISTHSETAI in Aquila's version of Isa
52:13, as cited in an article by Martin Hengel (since I'm away from the
library, I have not yet checked the citation against Field's edition of the
Hexapla). The LXX has IDOU SUNHSEI hO PAIS MOU, "Behold, my Servant shall
understand." Aquila apparently has IDOU EPISTHMWN hISTHSETAI hO PAIS MOU.
Now EPISTHMWN is technically an adjective meaning "understanding" (cf.
James 3:13, NT hapax), though it is tempting to see it here as a
substantive. But what about hISTHSETAI, a form which occurs nowhere in the
LXX? STHSETAI without the prefixed "hI" is of course the future middle
deponent of hISTHMI, but I can't see how hISTHSETAI can be traced to
hISTHMI; it is wrong both in form and in sense.
I thought of trying to trace hISTHSETAI to OIDA, on the grounds that the
classical form ISTE occurs instead of the normal Hellenistic form OIDATE in
Eph 5:5; Heb 12:17: and James 1:19. The concept of the Servant's "knowing"
would at least make sense in Isa 52:13. But there is a problem, for if we
were to understand hISTHSETAI as a wierd future form of OIDA or the
hypothetical root EIDW (cf. the lemma in LSJ), we still cannot explain the
rough breathing in hISTHSETAI.
The Tufts mophological engine is unable to parse hISTHSETAI. Can any of you
beat the computer?
Please reply either on or off list to your grateful colleague,
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:33 EDT