From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 23:08:48 EDT
At 9:50 AM -0700 10/9/00, Dmitriy Reznik wrote:
>I have a question concerning 1Cor 14:5:
>TELW DE PANTAS hUMAS LALEIN GLOSSAIS, MALLON DE hINA PROFHTEUHTE, MEIZWN
>DE hO PROFHTEUWN H hO LALWN GLWSSAIS, EKTOS EI MH DIERMHNEUHi . . .
>In this phrase EKTOS EI MH is usually translated as "unless [he
>interprets]". If I understand correctly, to say "unless" EI MH would be
>enough, and EKTOS has here the same meaning. Is it redundancy, or having
>both EKTOS and EI MH plays some role here?
No, I think it really is a case of redundancy, not uncommon in Hellenistic
Greek; seems rather colloquial: "'ceptin' unless ..."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:38 EDT