From: Mark Wilson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 26 2001 - 23:28:02 EST
> Matthew 28:19 says POREUQENTES OUN MAQHTEUSATE PANTA TA EQNH...
> I usually see this as "Therefore, go and make disciples of all
>question's about how to understand POREUQENTES; specifically, is it
>accurate to render
>this (adverbial) participle as an imperative? What are other valid
>options? Is there
>a consensus on which option is most likely meant?
> Are adverbial participles that modify imperatives generally to be
>imperatives as well?
I gave this quote in an earlier post regarding verb-modifying participles.
It is taken from Dr. Porter (Verbal Aspect):
"In some instances it may simply be better not to specify the relations
between the participle and the other elements of the construction,
since the context does not give specific indicators." [p. 191]
I wonder how many times we try to make sense of a passage by "imposing"
English grammar on a Greek text. I think we are less comfortable than the
Greeks when a sentence is left unpacked. I know Dr. Wallace likens
translating to "unpacking" a Greek construct, but he really does not give
clear guidelines as to when to stop unpacking :o )
(In fact, one criticism against him is his seemingly unabated efforts to
invent more and more categories. For example, he suggests over 30 categories
for the Genitive alone, including a Plenary Genitive!)
Perhaps a good rule of thumb would be to let participles just kind of
dangle. It makes for poor English, but I kind of like them when reading
"having gone, make disciples..."
"after you've gone, make disciples..."
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:51 EDT