[b-greek] Re: EGW EIMI in Isaiah 47:8,10

From: John Wilking (johnwilking@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 17 2001 - 01:52:34 EST


<x-flowed>



>From: "Dan Parker" <stoixein@sdf.lonestar.org>
>Reply-To: "Dan Parker" <stoixein@sdf.lonestar.org>
>To: Biblical Greek <b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
>CC: b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
>Subject: [b-greek] Re: EGW EIMI in Isaiah 47:8,10
>Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:55:05 +0000 (GMT)
>
> > >Brian,
> > >I would be interested in understanding why the writer of Isaiah would
> > >consider that the use of the first person pronoun "ani" would be
> > >recognized as related to the Hebrew verb "eheyeh" either on or off
>list.
> > >
> > >Sincerely,
> > >Dan Parker
> >
> > Are there any other instances in the LXX or Classical Greek in which EGW
> > EIMI, SU EI, AUTOS ESTIN or HMEIS ESMEN occur without a complement? I
>don't
> > have much chance to use TLG and besides I don't think it allows for
>searches
> > to include "without a complement."
> >
> > My hunch is that AUTOS ESTIN without a complement would, in theory, be
> > equivalent to YHVH.
> >
> > John C. Wilking
>
>John,
>Consider the use of EGW EIMI at John 9:9. There is no complement but it
>does not seem that anyone thought the blind man was calling himself YHVH.
>
>Sincerely,
>Dan Parker

Dan,

I think EGW EIMI in John 9:9 is an example of an incomplete sentence with an
implied complement.

OUC OUTOS ESTIN O KAQHMENOS KAI PROSAITWN;
OUTOS ESTIN (O KAQHMENOS KAI PROSAITWN)...
EGW EIMI (O KAQHMENOS KAI PROSAITWN).

John C. Wilking



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


</x-flowed>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:53 EDT