From: Jim West (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 10:14:13 EST
At 11:11 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>BDAG also cites Gen. 38:24 LXX, which says "EKPEPORNEUKE *QAMAR hH
>NUMFH SOU, KAI IDOU EN GASTRI ECEI EK PORNEIAS." Given that Tamar's
>behavior, which is characterized by EKPORNEUW, resulted in her be-
>coming pregnant, I'd say that if EKPORNEUW has any connection to the
>notion of inhospitality, it is that Tamar was all too hospitable.
>According to Hatch & Redpath's LXX Concordance, this verb shows up
>about 45 times in the LXX.
would you have us believe that every occurance of a word always carries the
same meaning? Does context mean nothing? Does "light" always mean "not
heavy, not obese"? Given your supposition about Tamar are you suggesting
that every occurance of ekporneuw results in pregnancy? You must, since you
imply that words always mean the same thing in spite of context.
Jim West, ThD
Biblical Studies Resources
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:54 EDT