[b-greek] Re: TADE LEGEI;

From: Clwinbery@aol.com
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 12:55:41 EDT

In a message dated 5/17/01 11:42:08 AM, GregStffrd@aol.com writes:

>In a message dated 05/15/2001 10:30:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>GregStffrd@aol.com writes:
><< Now, before I get to the grammatical problems I find with the above,
> what "things" does the AMHN say about God? It seems very clear that what
> AMHN says begins in verse 15, and since that is the case your translation
> essentially impossible. >>
>Since the thread on ARCH is closed (again, the archives have plenty of
>material for those interested), I would still like for John to support
>claim for his translation of TADE LEGEI which he claims are things the
>says TOU QEOU, when in fact verse 15 makes clear the fact that such a view
>impossible (IMO).
>No defense has been offered for this view (nor for other claims relating
>Aristotle's use of AITIA, but that is now past), but I would sure like
>to see
>if this translation was offered in light of obvious contextual and
>grammatical limitations or without recognition of such limitations. I have
>assume that some thought was given to verse 15; hence, I am curious to
>just what can be said about it. There is no need to get into the meaning
>ARCH to do so. If John could simply explain how he harmonizes his translation
>with verse 15 I would greatly appreciate it.
This thread is closed and any effort to bring it back in will be considered
ignoring the closing of the thread. If you want to discuss this any further,
you should do it off-list. In short, stay away from these two verses.

Carlton Winbery

B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:57 EDT