From: c stirling bartholomew (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2001 - 21:30:23 EDT
on 6/25/01 5:54 PM, c stirling bartholomew wrote:
> In other words, I would choose to be very cautious and tentative about the
> significance of the fronting of ANDRA. I have read all the works that you
> mentioned and numerous others which talk about word order and pragmatics. I
> am as yet unconvinced that this "rule" as you stated it is "one of the
> assured results of modern linguistics."
Why am I unconvinced? Because the whole notion of "fronting" assumes that we
know for sure what order constituents should take in a Greek clause. You
cannot identify a "fronted" constituent unless you have identified a
standard pattern. All of the logic of "fronting" goes to pieces if you
simply deny that this pattern has been conclusively identified.
I am taking an attitude of "suspended judgement" on the standard pattern
issue and for that reason also on the question of "fronting." I know that
the pragmatics folks will say I have missed the point, that a fronted
constituent is not dependent on a standard pattern but having read in great
detail the arguments for this position I still think they are wrong.
In my mind saying that you can identify a fronted constituent without having
a standard pattern is like saying you can see black camels moving across a
black desert on a moonless night.
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:00 EDT