From: Steven R. Lo Vullo (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 00:45:00 EDT
on 9/4/01 10:25 PM, Mark Wilson at email@example.com wrote:
> Heb. 11:10a
> EXEDECETO GAR THN TOUS QEMELIOUS ECOUSAN POLIN...
> Were there some QEMELIOUS that first century readers
> would have understood as TOUS QEMELIOUS? If so, what
> were they? The idea I get from this passage is some
> foundations of a non-temporal or non-Promised Land nature,
> but that seems like too much to be supplied from this passage.
> Not finding any contextually developed "foundations,"
> how are we to understand the definite article here?
The contrast is between SKHNAIS in v. 9 and THN TOUS QEMELIOUS ECOUSAN POLIN
in v. 10, i.e., between the transitory and the permanent. NIDNTT suggests
that QEMELIOUS "[i]n Heb. 11:10 and Rev. 21:14, 19 ... refers to the
foundations of the future city of God." In Rev 21.14 we have QEMELIOUS
DWDEKA and in 21.19 hOI QEMELIOI. Perhaps the author of Hebrews was thinking
of the same tradition as John.
Steve Lo Vullo
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:05 EDT