From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2001 - 13:08:29 EDT
At 12:41 PM -0400 9/17/01, Rbsads@aol.com wrote:
>I don't believe there's an ounce of difference in this instance between TON
>OIKONOMON THS ADIKIAS and TON OIKONOMON TON ADIKON in 16:8 or between EK TOU
>MAMWNA THS ADIKIAS and EK TOU MAMWNA TOU
>ADIKOU in 16:9. And yes, I do think these are attributive genitives.
>I guess there is no need to make the reading any more difficult than
>unrighteous manager and unrighteous mammon.
>Is there any anyway to determine whether the attributive genitive is
>describing a quality of a type of mammon (the unrighteous type of mammon) or
>is describing a quality that is common to all mammon (all mammon is
>Is either interpretation possible, and then is the choice a matter only of
I do think that which subcategory of an adnominal genitive one recognizes
as most appropriate has more to do with translating into a target language
than it does with distinctions in the Greek original.
As for the possibility that there might be some righteous mammon, I'm
reminded of a line in "The King and I" where the king responds to Anna's
saying that the assertion that he is a barbarian is "a lie" with, "Not only
is it a lie, it is a FALSE lie." So it may well be that the descriptive
adjective "unrighteous" is more rhetorical than anything else.
Does any list-member want to argue for the sort of distinction Richard is
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:07 EDT