From: c stirling bartholomew (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:50:24 EDT
on 9/26/01 1:03 PM, Mark DelCogliano wrote:
> Can a pronomial inflectional ending really be said to have prominence?
Yes, it has the lowest level of subject encoding possible:
The levels are: (I doing this from memory so I may miss something)
Full Noun Phrase (most)
Pronominal Verb Inflection (least)
The issue of subject prominence, specifically how it is linked to the level
of subject encoding is a set of relative relationships which can be viewed
as a range from least to most.
This whole topic comes under the subject of "participant reference" in
discussions of Discourse Analysis.
Clearly this is a different issue from prominence marked by constituent
order. That I believe, was what your original question was about.
> I fear this a bit over me head. Could you explain to me what is meant by 'an
> agentive prepositional phrase in clause final position is [not] MARKED by
> its position'? Does this refer to some sort of 'default' positioning for
> such a prep phrase?
I am not sure I would go so far as to call it a 'default' position. All I am
saying is that a prepositional phrase like hUPW IWANNOU which is used to
indicate agency is not going to attract anyone's attention by being placed
at the end of the clause. I would read over such a clause without even
thinking about the position of hUPW IWANNOU.
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:07 EDT