From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:18:30 EDT
At 8:35 PM -0400 10/7/01, Moon-Ryul Jung wrote:
>It just occurred to my mind what would be the proper parsing of
>IOUDAIOUS TE KAI hELLHNAS.
>In the case of English "both X and Y", the following bracketing
>(1) [ both [ X and Y] ]
>That is, "both" modifies "X and Y". In the case of X TE KAI hELLENAS,
>do we have the following?
>(2) [ [ X TE] KAI Y ]
>In this case, TE modifies only X.
Only, for what it's worth, that, if we return to Denniston's initial
discussion of TE KAI (p. 511): "(5) Corresponsive, TE KAI, TE ... KAI.
This tends very largely to replace TE ... TE."
From that point of view, we get [ [X TE] [Y TE] ]. Somehow I don't think
this brings us one inch further toward demonstration that one of these
elements is stressed more than the other.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:08 EDT