From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 10:43:48 EDT
At 11:20 PM +1000 10/23/01, George Athas wrote:
>The latter portion of Rom 11:25 reads:
>hOTI PWRWSIS APO MEROUS TWi ISRAHL GEGONEN ACRIS hOU TO PLHRWMA TWN EQNWN
>How ought this be translated? I'd like to focus particular attention on
>the choice of
>translation for ACRIS hOU and the use of the subjunctive mood for EISELQHi.
Isn't this very much like Lk 21:24 KAI IEROUSALHM ESTAI PATOUMENH hUPO
EQNWN, ACRI hOU PLHRWQWSIN KAIROI EQNWN.?
My understanding of the construction is that ACRI(S) hOU + subjunctive
envisions a future point in time at which a process will be completed.
There's a contingency limiting the continuation of the process described in
the clause with the indicative.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:10 EDT