From: Mark Wilson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 08:49:50 EDT
> Regarding , TOUTO GAR ESTIN TO QELHMA TOU PATPOS MOU, hINA
>PAS hO QEWRWN TON hUION KAI PISTEUWN EIS AUTON ECHi ZWHN
>AIWNION, KAI ANASTHSW AUTON EGW [EN] THi ESCATHi.
> It seems to me that hO QEWRWN and PISTEUWN represents an
>on going process that results in ZWHN AIWNION and ANASTHSW.
To nobody's surprise I am sure, I would simply say: No. The
Present tense does not denote on-going action. Any "on-going" aspect
would be inherent in a verb's Lexical Aspect. Grammatical Aspect
does NOT denote "on-going" action. And I just don't see how one
can argue for a "on-going" aspect with these verbs
in this context, but concerning the ptc PISTEUWN here...
In fairness, I would point you to Wallace's GGBB, pg. 621. footnote 22.
When I first read it, I fell out of my chair. Then, after I got up,
I realized that one's theology deeply affects one's grammatical
conclusions (which, if true, should also inform you as to why
I hold to my position).
My (theological) thoughts, :o )
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:10 EDT