From: Mark Wilson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Oct 27 2001 - 11:35:07 EDT
>1 Cor 10:10 KAI APOLONTO hUPO TOU OLOUQREUTOU
>and they were destroyed/killed by the destroyer
>APOLONTO is parsed as aorist middle, because it is middle in form, even
>though it may be middle or passive in sense. (Perish or be killed).
>APOLLUNTO is parsed as imperfective passive. One can argue that this
>is based on syntax in that it is possible to supply an agent to a passive
>form but not to a middle form.
You say here at the end, I think, that an agent can not be
supplied to a middle, but you indicate the hUPO is retained
in 1 Cor 10.10, which seems to be a Middle with supplied agent.
The sense I get from this verse is
they got themselves killed (middle) by the destroyer (agent).
As if the Middle states that the experiencers have only themselves
to blame for a destroyer/agent killing them. Based on their own
decisions, they must bear responsibility to what happened to them.
(I guess the passive in 10:9 would not stress the experiencers
own actions that brought about the effect.)
I'm sure I misunderstood you. Could you clarify this please?
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:10 EDT