[b-greek] Re: Romans One: Verses 3 and 4

From: Clwinbery@aol.com
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:58:36 EST



In a message dated 1/15/02 5:13:58 PM, metcalfeassociates@sympatico.ca writes:

>I am currently working my through Romans Chapter One. Theologically, much
>debate has occured over Verses 3 and 4 regarding "two natures" verses "two
>stages" (John Murray, Lenski-they actually agree on something!) Based upon
>the Greek, is there a strong case to be built for "two stages" as John
>Murray and Vos seem to imply?
>
If you want to talk about how the participles relate to TOU hUIOU AUTOU or
how any other elements relate to sequence or circumstance, this is within the
bounds of b-Greek. But let's not discuss "the two natures" of Christ or any
other such subject covered at Nicea, Chalcedon or any of the councils. So
please rephrase your question so as to discuss Greek Grammar or a closely
related subject.

Thanks,

Carlton Winbery
Louisiana College
Co-moderator B-Greek

---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:16 EDT