From: Moon-Ryul Jung (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 12:30:43 EST
While I am reading NT, I often notice that GAR S,
where S is a sentence, does not necessarily related to the
For example, given
S1. Gar S2. Gar S3, S2 is often related to S1, with S2 and S3 are
parallel (In my interpretation).
S1. Gar S2. S3. S4. S5,
S2 is not directly related to S1, but the whole paragraph S2 - S5
is related to S1, with S2 stating the starting point for the following
sentences (in my interpretation).
Is my perception justified based on the grammar of GAR?
Moon R. Jung
Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:19 EDT