From: Carl W. Conrad (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 19:26:53 EST
At 9:07 PM +0000 3/8/02, Mark Wilson wrote:
>EIS EPAINON DOZHS THS CARITOS AUTOU
>hHS ECARITWSEN hHMAS EN TWi HGAPHMENWi
>What is the implication here with the use of
>EN plus the participle TWi HGAPHMENWi?
>In this long section (3-14), the concept of "in Christ"
>is elsewhere expressed EN CRISTWi, EN AUTWi, EN hWi. Why
>the use of this sole participial phrase? What does it convey
>different than the non-participial EN phrases?
A simpler answer to this question might be: it's one more variant
formulation of what is essentially the very same formula.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months:: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
email@example.com OR firstname.lastname@example.org
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:20 EDT