From: Steven Lo Vullo (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Mar 29 2002 - 14:55:19 EST
on 3/29/02 1:16 PM, Michael Abernathy at email@example.com wrote:
> EIDOTES hOTI OU DIKAIOUTAI ANQRWPOS EX ERGWN NOMOU EAN MH DIA PISTEWS IHSOU
> In another forum we have been discussing whether EAN MH should be translated
> as adversative or exceptive. What does EAN MH modify in Galatians 2:16 OU
> DIKAIOUTAI ANQRWPOS or EX ERGWN NOMOU?
EAN is a subordinate conditional conjunction marking a conditional clause
dependent on DIKAIOUTAI. OU DIKAIOUTAI ANQRWPOS must be understood both with
EX ERGWN NOMOU *and* EAN MH DIA PISTEWS IHSOU CRISTOU, since both modify it.
In order to better understand the relationship of both to DIKAIOUTAI, break
the clause down as follows:
OU DIKAIOUTAI ANQRWPOS EX ERGWN NOMOU (a person is not justified by works of
OU DIKAIOUTAI ANQRWPOS ... EAN MH DIA PISTEWS IHSOU CRISTOU (a person is not
justified except/unless through faith in Jesus Christ)
The point is that a person is NOT justified by works of the law, but is ONLY
justified through faith in Jesus Christ.
I don't see any way possible for EAN MH to modify EX ERGWN NOMOU, since it
introduces the subordinate clause EAN MH DIA PISTEWS IHSOU CRISTOU, which is
no doubt dependent on DIKAIOUTAI.
Steven Lo Vullo
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:22 EDT