[b-greek] Re: Luke 19:11 and grammatical marking

From: Paul O. Wendland (wendlanp@wls.wels.net)
Date: Fri Apr 19 2002 - 18:29:18 EDT



> In a message dated 4/18/2002 4:11:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> Clwinbery@aol.com writes:
>
> >> IEROUSALHM AUTON KAI DOKEIN AUTOUS hOTI PARAXRHMA MELLEI >> hH
> BASILEIA TOU QEOU ANAFAINESQAI
>
>
> Logos likewise indicates that IEROUSALHM is genitive. Since the form
> hIEROSOLUMA or IEROUSALHM is apparently not used in any case
> distinction, it
> is interesting that Logos/Accordance and BGAD state so
> confidently that it is
> genitive. There are a number of instances listed in both the LXX
> and the NT
> with dat. following. I'm wondering why the confidence that
> IEROUSALHM is
> gen. Any ideas?
>
> gfsomsel
>
--------------------------------

Bible Windows (based on the Fribergs' Analytical Greek New Testament) offers
both dative and genitive as possibilities for IEROUSALHM, with the dative
listed first.

===============================
Paul O. Wendland


---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:24 EDT