On Fri, 09 Mar 2001 14:51:26 -0000 "Mark Wilson" writes: > > Matt 28:19a > > POREUQENTES OUN MAQHTEUSATE PANTA TA EQNH > > What is the grammatical sense here that leads > most translations to add KAI? (I do NOT get the > sense myself of two separate instructions.) King James translators apparently did not appreciate the participial nuance of attendant circumstance that modern exegetes recognize. Just how or when this appreciation came about is a good question. Anyhow, an attendant circumstantial participle gives the POREUQENTES the same force as the main verb, here the imperatival MAQHTEUSATE. Paul Dixon --- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu