From patrick@durusau.net Wed May 23 07:57:37 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:57:06 -0400 From: Patrick Durusau Subject: OPC and RFC 3986 To: Dave Welsh , Doug Mahugh , Frank Farance , Jerry Smith , Jon Bosak , "Levine, Leonard F CIV DISA GES-E" , Norm Walsh , "Lynne A. Price" , Rex Jaeschke , Richard Barber , Robert Weir , Steve Carton , Tim Schoechle , "Mason, James David (MXM)" , Kevin Trainor , Eduardo Gutentag Reply-to: patrick@durusau.net X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1179932246-503600990000-F3fpwQ X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.10.100.8:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Connect: unknown[66.110.197.207] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1179932246 X-ASG-Whitelist: Client X-ASG-Orig-Subj: OPC and RFC 3986 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at insimail.com Greetings, I have been looking at the granularity of the addressing of the Open Packaging Convetions and was wondering why it relies on pchar in RFC 3986 rather than pchar in RFC 3987? Recall that RFC 3987 is the IRI RFC. Thinking that going from URI to IRI may have a real impact on OPC. But, not going with RFC 3987 I suspect is going to see substantial opposition from CJKV interests. Even if that isn't a local interest in the U.S., it should be for international markets. Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau Patrick@Durusau.net Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!