From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Thu Jun 21 12:14:53 2007 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:14:19 -0700 (PDT) From: jon.bosak@sun.com Subject: INCITS-V1: Contradiction period, lack thereof Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 X-Authentication-warning: jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com: bosak set sender to jon.bosak@sun.com using -f [Patrick Durusau, beginning with a quote from Doug Mahugh:] | >But here's the more important question, it seems to me: why are | >we having this discussion at this point in time? After there | >being no discussion of contradictions at all during our call that | >took place within the 30-day perceived contradiction period, why | >has this suddenly come to the fore? | > | That is easy enough to answer. INCITS never asked nor forwarded DIS | 29500 during the 30 day contradiction period. Why didn't V1, as the relevant U.S. National Body, get a chance to register contradictions during the 30-day perceived contradiction period? Given the opportunity supposedly guaranteed by the JTC1 process, I suspect that several of us would have had something to say. This is rather a significant process failure, is it not? Jon