From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Sun Jun 24 15:34:23 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:33:47 -0400 From: Steve Carton Subject: RE: INCITS-V1: Contradiction period, lack thereof In-reply-to: <200706211914.l5LJEJj2879123@jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by midtown.nycx.com id l5OMXmT6026195 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-topic: INCITS-V1: Contradiction period, lack thereof Thread-index: Ace0OGta/KdV9VT7SMCUhN6xlKIusgCdzphw X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Well, this may be interesting, but, so what? Is there a recourse for process failure? -----Original Message----- From: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org [mailto:owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org] On Behalf Of jon.bosak@sun.com Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:14 PM To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Subject: INCITS-V1: Contradiction period, lack thereof [Patrick Durusau, beginning with a quote from Doug Mahugh:] | >But here's the more important question, it seems to me: why are we | >having this discussion at this point in time? After there being no | >discussion of contradictions at all during our call that took place | >within the 30-day perceived contradiction period, why has this | >suddenly come to the fore? | > | That is easy enough to answer. INCITS never asked nor forwarded DIS | 29500 during the 30 day contradiction period. Why didn't V1, as the relevant U.S. National Body, get a chance to register contradictions during the 30-day perceived contradiction period? Given the opportunity supposedly guaranteed by the JTC1 process, I suspect that several of us would have had something to say. This is rather a significant process failure, is it not? Jon