From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Mon Jun 25 00:43:16 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_0xiJLetgwZfdxtmhf+965Q)" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:41:54 -0400 From: Stephen Peront Subject: RE: INCITS-V1: NamingDIS29500-Durasau-12 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Content-language: en-us Thread-index: Ace2zP0lxsP6AxkKQFKn1MMgeqdQ1QAKrG6A X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_0xiJLetgwZfdxtmhf+965Q) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi Rob. I am not sure what you are implying, Rob; your wording below is quite ambiguous. The question was to you, which I see that you have again quietly ignored. My beliefs are not a cause for concern (especially since I have stuck to what has been written), however your jesting at renaming OOXML to the name of a well known bagel topping (LOX) calls into question the seriousness of your concern; backed by your reasoning being that people in the market mistyping the name to something that is confusing to the name of another product in the market (notice that it is the mistyped name that is confusing, not the correct name) after verbally telling another committee member not to consider what people are currently doing in the market calls into question the integrity of your concern. You have every right to continue with this and other comments, and I would encourage you to. I will continue to evaluate DIS 29500 along with this and every other comment for accuracy and whether it adds value to our final recommendation. May I suggest that you remove the jesting and accusations and focus on productive input and feedback, especially given our tight timeline. Have an awesome day! Thanks, -Stephen From: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org [mailto:owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org] On Behalf Of robert_weir@us.ibm.com Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:03 PM To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Subject: RE: INCITS-V1: NamingDIS29500-Durasau-12 > > Are you saying that the decision to name OpenOffice is not in an > archived marketing plan document somewhere? If anything I would say > that IBM making a comment that is directly related to one of their > marketing plans as an argument to defeat a standard by a competing > company and technology is a case for anti-trust and continued proof > for why I suggest we strike the naming comment. > Stephen, If you believe any of what you say you be true, then I would urge you to raise your perceived issue directly with INCITS and their legal counsel. In fact if you believe any of what you are saying then you are obligated to report it. For my part, until I hear otherwise, I'll continue to put forward this and other comments related to DIS 29500. Regards, -Rob --Boundary_(ID_0xiJLetgwZfdxtmhf+965Q) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Rob…

 

I am not sure what you are implying, Rob; your wording = below is quite ambiguous. The question was to you, which I see that you have = again quietly ignored.

 

My beliefs are not a cause for concern (especially since = I have stuck to what has been written), however your jesting at renaming OOXML to the = name of a well known bagel topping (LOX) calls into question the seriousness = of your concern; backed by your reasoning being that people in the market = mistyping the name to something that is confusing to the name of another product in = the market (notice that it is the mistyped name that is confusing, not the correct = name) after verbally telling another committee member not to consider what people = are currently doing in the market calls into question the integrity of your concern.

 

You have every right to continue with this and other = comments, and I would encourage you to.

 

I will continue to evaluate DIS 29500 along with this and = every other comment for accuracy and whether it adds value to our final recommendation.

 

May I suggest that you remove the jesting and accusations = and focus on productive input and feedback, especially given our tight = timeline.

 

Have an awesome day!

 

Thanks,

-Stephen

 

From:= owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org [mailto:owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org] = On Behalf Of robert_weir@us.ibm.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:03 PM
To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org
Subject: RE: INCITS-V1: = NamingDIS29500-Durasau-12

 


>  
> Are you saying that the = decision to name OpenOffice is not in an
> archived marketing plan document somewhere? If anything I would = say
> that IBM making a comment that is directly related to one of = their
> marketing plans as an argument to defeat a standard by a = competing
> company and technology is a case for anti-trust and continued = proof
> for why I suggest we strike the naming comment. =

>

Stephen,  

If you believe any of what you say = you be true, then I would urge you to raise your perceived issue directly with = INCITS and their legal counsel.  In fact if you believe any of what you = are saying then you are obligated to report it.  For my part, until I = hear otherwise, I'll continue to put forward this and other comments related = to DIS 29500.

Regards,

-Rob

--Boundary_(ID_0xiJLetgwZfdxtmhf+965Q)--