From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Mon Jun 25 03:36:05 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Rbm9e4r+O0jsmdBdjR1ZWQ)" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:34:57 -0400 From: Stephen Peront Subject: INCITS-V1: Wier - OpenPackagingConventions-RELAXNG.zip Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Content-language: en-us Thread-index: Ace3FHmSWnhD2LZqQtCMlnbeuoLBZQ== X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_Rbm9e4r+O0jsmdBdjR1ZWQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi Team. Regarding the following comment submitted by Rob: MB1 Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/Table/ Note (e.g. Table 1) Type of comment2 Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations on each comment submitted US OpenPackagi ngConvention s- RELAXNG.zip - ge There is no explicit indication given as to whether this annex is informative or normative. See ISO Directives, Part 2, section 5.2.6 Clarify the status of this annex 2007-05-14: Submitted by Rob Weir as #1-011 See email thread #1. 2007-05-29: Discussed during meeting. Needs to be clarified. The annex is in the PDF but then points off to electronic document. I agree that we should comment on this and ask to have the status clarified. Have an awesome day! Cheers, -Stephen --Boundary_(ID_Rbm9e4r+O0jsmdBdjR1ZWQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi Team…

 

Regarding the following comment submitted by Rob:

 

MB1

Clause No./

Subclause No./

Annex

(e.g. 3.1)

Paragraph/

Figure/Table/

Note

(e.g. Table 1)

Type

of

comment2

Comment (justification for change) by the MB

Proposed change by the MB

Secretariat observations

on each comment submitted

 

US

OpenPackagi

ngConvention

s-

RELAXNG.zip

-

ge

There is no explicit indication given as to whether this

annex is informative or normative. See ISO Directives,

Part 2, section 5.2.6

Clarify the status of this annex

2007-05-14: Submitted by

Rob Weir as #1-011

See email thread #1.

2007-05-29: Discussed

during meeting. Needs to be

clarified. The annex is in the

PDF but then points off

to electronic document.

 

 

I agree that we should comment on this and ask to have the status clarified.

 

 

Have an awesome day!

 

Cheers,

-Stephen

 

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_Rbm9e4r+O0jsmdBdjR1ZWQ)--