From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Sat Jul 14 09:56:03 2007
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_9sqVtP/JKOwTToVYtiqJug)"
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:54:38 -0400
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: INCITS-V1: PLEASE PROOF: Draft Minutes of the V1 Meeting on
2007-07-13
In-reply-to: <003401c7c617$07524c90$15f6e5b0$@com>
Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org
To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org
Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL03/WTF/M/Lotus(Release
6.5.6FP1|April 24, 2007) at 07/14/2007 12:54:39 PM,
Serialize complete at 07/14/2007 12:54:39 PM
X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_9sqVtP/JKOwTToVYtiqJug)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
> The notes look good, here are some important points that I didn't see in
the
> notes
>
> [Section 8]
> 1. Motion by Stephen for a vote of "Yes, with comments"; denied by the
> Chairman
> 2. The names of those who motioned for each of the straw polls
> 3. The motion by Stephen for a reconsideration of a vote of "Yes, with
> comments"; denied by the Chairman
These are meeting minutes, not a transcript of everything that was said.
The obligation is to record the time the meeting started and ended, the
attendance, the topics discussed and decisions made by the committee.
Also, every parliamentary authority that I'm aware of reserves a motion to
reconsider to a person who voted on the prevailing side of the vote. The
ideas is that it is pointless to vote on an item again unless someone who
was on the prevailing side of that vote indicated that they changed their
mind. How else could the results change? Since you voted in favor of
"yes, with comments", a motion which lost, a motion to reconsider coming
from you was out of order.
-Rob
--Boundary_(ID_9sqVtP/JKOwTToVYtiqJug)
Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
> The notes look good, here are some important points that I didn't
see in the
> notes
>
> [Section 8]
> 1. Motion by Stephen for a vote of "Yes, with comments";
denied by the
> Chairman
> 2. The names of those who motioned for each of the straw polls
> 3. The motion by Stephen for a reconsideration of a vote of "Yes,
with
> comments"; denied by the Chairman
These are meeting minutes, not a transcript of everything
that was said. The obligation is to record the time the meeting started
and ended, the attendance, the topics discussed and decisions made by the
committee.
Also, every parliamentary authority that I'm aware
of reserves a motion to reconsider to a person who voted on the prevailing
side of the vote. The ideas is that it is pointless to vote on an
item again unless someone who was on the prevailing side of that vote indicated
that they changed their mind. How else could the results change?
Since you voted in favor of "yes, with comments", a motion which
lost, a motion to reconsider coming from you was out of order.
-Rob
--Boundary_(ID_9sqVtP/JKOwTToVYtiqJug)--