From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Fri Aug 10 13:23:17 2007
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)"
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:20:58 -0400
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: INCITS-V1: Meeting reminder: 17 August 2007 starting at 1 PM
Eastern Standard Daylight Savings Time
In-reply-to: <46BCAE52.3000902@durusau.net>
Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org
To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org
Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL03/WTF/M/Lotus(Release
6.5.6FP1|April 24, 2007) at 08/10/2007 04:20:58 PM,
Serialize complete at 08/10/2007 04:20:58 PM
X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> I will put the comments on the agenda so we can discuss them but I think
> the prior question we will need to answer is what to do with the
> comments after they have been discussed? I don't need an answer to that
> today but it is something that you probably need to think about prior to
> the meeting.
Patrick,
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that at the start of the process
you suggested that V1 could continue to process comments, even after we
submitted our recommendation to INCITS. Certainly, once INCITS has
submitted their ballot to JTC1, there would be no sense processing
comments. But I'm sure any additional comments we can provide them
between now and then will only help them in their decision-making process,
as well as provide further feedback for the improvement of DIS 29500.
-Rob
--Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)
Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> I will put the comments on the agenda so we can
discuss them but I think
> the prior question we will need to answer is what to do with the
> comments after they have been discussed? I don't need an answer to
that
> today but it is something that you probably need to think about prior
to
> the meeting.
Patrick,
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that at the
start of the process you suggested that V1 could continue to process comments,
even after we submitted our recommendation to INCITS. Certainly,
once INCITS has submitted their ballot to JTC1, there would be no sense
processing comments. But I'm sure any additional comments we can
provide them between now and then will only help them in their decision-making
process, as well as provide further feedback for the improvement of DIS
29500.
-Rob
--Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)--