From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Fri Aug 10 13:23:17 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:20:58 -0400 From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: INCITS-V1: Meeting reminder: 17 August 2007 starting at 1 PM Eastern Standard Daylight Savings Time In-reply-to: <46BCAE52.3000902@durusau.net> Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: incits-v1@incits-v1.org Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL03/WTF/M/Lotus(Release 6.5.6FP1|April 24, 2007) at 08/10/2007 04:20:58 PM, Serialize complete at 08/10/2007 04:20:58 PM X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > I will put the comments on the agenda so we can discuss them but I think > the prior question we will need to answer is what to do with the > comments after they have been discussed? I don't need an answer to that > today but it is something that you probably need to think about prior to > the meeting. Patrick, I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that at the start of the process you suggested that V1 could continue to process comments, even after we submitted our recommendation to INCITS. Certainly, once INCITS has submitted their ballot to JTC1, there would be no sense processing comments. But I'm sure any additional comments we can provide them between now and then will only help them in their decision-making process, as well as provide further feedback for the improvement of DIS 29500. -Rob --Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> I will put the comments on the agenda so we can discuss them but I think
> the prior question we will need to answer is what to do with the
> comments after they have been discussed? I don't need an answer to that
> today but it is something that you probably need to think about prior to
> the meeting.

Patrick,

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that at the start of the process you suggested that V1 could continue to process comments, even after we submitted our recommendation to INCITS.  Certainly, once INCITS has submitted their ballot to JTC1, there would be no sense processing comments.  But I'm sure any additional comments we can provide them between now and then will only help them in their decision-making process, as well as provide further feedback for the improvement of DIS 29500.

-Rob
--Boundary_(ID_BJ0ENMjcIm2ZxOpwPTBzIQ)--