From owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org Fri Aug 17 05:48:01 2007 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:44:59 -0400 From: Patrick Durusau Subject: INCITS-V1: Processing NB comments Sender: owner-incits-v1@incits-v1.org To: Incits-V1 Reply-to: incits-v1@incits-v1.org X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1187354706-684500190000-E618Iy X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.10.100.8:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Connect: unknown[66.110.197.207] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1187354706 X-ASG-Whitelist: Client X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Processing NB comments X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at insimail.com Greetings! One thing that occurred to me this morning was that it might be a good idea to make a pass through the full set of comments from all NBs and to defer any consideration of comments on part 3, which is entirely non-normative and other non-normative material in parts 1, 2, 4, and, 5. While avoiding errors in the standards text anywhere is important, errors in non-normative text seem secondary to me as opposed to problems with the normative text. Once we have considered all the comments on normative text, time permitting, we can then consider comments on non-normative material. One thing that would help in that regard would be having a version of the proposal that has only the normative text. Could someone on TC 45 ask for production of such a version? I have asked and it was not forthcoming. Hope everyone is looking forward to a great weekend! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300)