<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative Fatal1ty Keyboard: Same Shit, Different Name - Gizmodo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/2006/09/01/creative-fatal1ty-keyboard-same-shit-different-name-gizmodo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/2006/09/01/creative-fatal1ty-keyboard-same-shit-different-name-gizmodo/</link>
	<description>design, game, drink, bitch, repeat</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erick Guessford</title>
		<link>http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/2006/09/01/creative-fatal1ty-keyboard-same-shit-different-name-gizmodo/#comment-4279</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Guessford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/?p=74#comment-4279</guid>
		<description>Though this is a very, very old post, I felt the urge to give my .$02. First of all, you probably have never touched the keyboard, so you are missing %50 of the knowledge required to judge the keyboard. I own it myself, and it's my baby. I didn't buy it because some guy who's ridiculously good at video games has his surname slapped on it, I bought it because it's incredibly small and portable, the backlighting on the keys is easy on the eyes and lights up the keyboard extremely well, the keys themselves are very well designed as well as the keystroke action, and it's very compactly designed with no bells and whistles which is what I was looking for. It might as well have the Hello Kitty logo on it. I bought it for what it was, not who it represented. Consider that before you damn a product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though this is a very, very old post, I felt the urge to give my .$02. First of all, you probably have never touched the keyboard, so you are missing %50 of the knowledge required to judge the keyboard. I own it myself, and it&#8217;s my baby. I didn&#8217;t buy it because some guy who&#8217;s ridiculously good at video games has his surname slapped on it, I bought it because it&#8217;s incredibly small and portable, the backlighting on the keys is easy on the eyes and lights up the keyboard extremely well, the keys themselves are very well designed as well as the keystroke action, and it&#8217;s very compactly designed with no bells and whistles which is what I was looking for. It might as well have the Hello Kitty logo on it. I bought it for what it was, not who it represented. Consider that before you damn a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Archambeault</title>
		<link>http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/2006/09/01/creative-fatal1ty-keyboard-same-shit-different-name-gizmodo/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Archambeault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibiblio.org/dlucas/?p=74#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Expand the idea of the competition.  You compare Jordan and Woods who are playing physical activities, and well Jordan can beat Woods at BBall, and Woods can beat Jordan in Golf..  Well theres more then 1 simple way of competition, mental &#38; physical.  Those 2 big names handle the physical avenues of competition, where online gamers like to battle it out with a test of wits, instead of physical abilities.  Just because computers have not been around as long as football or basketball, doesn't mean anything, back then when the first BBall game was played, I am sure there were some critic's somewhere saying the same thing your saying, and look where it is at now.

Jordan &#38; Basketball = Physical activities
Woods &#38; Golf = Physical activities

Fataility &#38; Gaming = Mental Activities
 = Mental Activities
 = Mental Activities
 = Mental Activities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expand the idea of the competition.  You compare Jordan and Woods who are playing physical activities, and well Jordan can beat Woods at BBall, and Woods can beat Jordan in Golf..  Well theres more then 1 simple way of competition, mental &amp; physical.  Those 2 big names handle the physical avenues of competition, where online gamers like to battle it out with a test of wits, instead of physical abilities.  Just because computers have not been around as long as football or basketball, doesn&#8217;t mean anything, back then when the first BBall game was played, I am sure there were some critic&#8217;s somewhere saying the same thing your saying, and look where it is at now.</p>
<p>Jordan &amp; Basketball = Physical activities<br />
Woods &amp; Golf = Physical activities</p>
<p>Fataility &amp; Gaming = Mental Activities<br />
 = Mental Activities<br />
 = Mental Activities<br />
 = Mental Activities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

