From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Mon Mar 25 22:52:03 EST 1996
Article: 643 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!agate!cocoa.brown.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,bit.listserv.geodesic,alt.architecture.alternative,pa.environment,sci.environment,alt.home.repair,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal
Subject: Yet another solar heated swimming pool
Date: 24 Mar 1996 13:53:02 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 152
Message-ID: <4j45me$jmk@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47660 alt.energy.renewable:14645 bit.listserv.geodesic:4449 alt.architecture.alternative:6498 sci.environment:88954 alt.home.repair:20777 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5811 alt.solar.thermal:643

So, I'm looking at the $450 15' diameter x 42" deep swimming pool in the 1993
Spring/Summer J C Penny catalog, which would contain about 619 cubic feet of
water, ie about 5,000 gallons or 40,000 pounds of water...

Solar pool heating is easy, compared to other kinds of solar heating, since
temperatures are low, and there's a built-in thermal mass. What would it take
to keep this pool warm all winter, or to make it into a huge outdoor hot tub,
in the 5,500 F degree day climate where I live, near Philadelphia?
 
The biggest problem with solar pool heating is the cover. "Solar pool covers"
have low R-values, usually not more than R1, and they are tinted blue, which
keeps the sun out :-) Suppose we somehow cover the pool with a fairly rigid
R-20 cover, and keep it closed all the time, except when the pool is in use. 

The cover might be a 20' x 20' x 6" thick panel made with 2x6s on 4' centers,
with 6" of fiberglass insulation inside, and 1/4" flakeboard or galvanized
sheet metal on top, with some plastic-coated shiny aluminum foil on the bottom.
Innovative Insulation in Arlington, Texas, sells some shiny tough foil for
mobile home roofs in 4' wide rolls for about 50 cents/ft^2. The pool cover
might be hinged with a pipe along the north edge, with a counterweight, so
it could easily be tilted up to the south at about a 45 degree angle. This
would reflect some winter sun into the pool and reduce the wind when the cover
is open, but the main pool heating would come from a 4' high x 20' long piece
of vertical plastic glazing along the south edge, with an air gap behind that
and some dark-colored straw bales behind that, to act as a solar air heater. 

Suppose the pool were surrounded by straw bales, each 16" x 16" x 36", costing
$2 each, eg 40 straw bales under the pool, and another 70 bales around all
the sides of the pool, to make a 4' high wall around the pool, 6" taller than
the pool, with an average R-value of 20 (?) The bales around the perimeter
could be stacked up and mortared together like giant concrete blocks to make
a deck for the pool with a wide flat edge, and the soft underside of the cover
might deform and sit on the deck to make a good seal when it is closed.

The straw bales under the pool itself could be spread apart to make 8 air
ducts, each 6" wide x 16" deep, running from north to south along the ground,
to allow solar-warmed air from the south glazing to travel across the top
of the pool, under the cover, down the north back wall of the pool, between
the pool and the bales, and under the pool from north to south. This might
work with passive plastic film gravity backdraft air dampers in holes at the
top and bottom of the straw bales behind the glazing, but a PV-powered (-:)
fan would make it work better. The whole ground area should be covered with
some sort of vapor barrier, eg poly film, to keep moisture out of the straw,
and the tops of the ducts below the pool should have some bridging, eg 1/8"
of newspaper with 3 layers of chicken wire on top of that, and an inch of sand
mix cement over that. Let's ignore the heat loss from the ducts to the ground. 

A shallow reflecting pool made from a single piece of 10' wide EPDM rubber
roofing material over a 6" earth berm around the edge would augment the sun
when frozen and keep weeds from growing up in front of the glazing.

It might look like this, not to scale:     ^  (open)      
                                           |
   cccccccccccccccccccc              ccccccccccccccccccccHcccccCW 
    gggggggggggggggggg                g..................P _
    gggggggggggggggggg         <-- S  g  ppppppppppppppp P
    gggggggggggggggggg                g  pppp water pppp P 4'
    gDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDg   r ~~~~~~~~~~ g  ppppppppppppppp P
.........................rprrpprprprp ...................P.............
                         |<--- 8' --->|  |<--- 15' --->| P
                                      |<------ 18' ----->|

    key:                 rprprprp----ccccccccccccccccccccHcccccCW 
                         p           cgsssssssssssssssssss      .
    p is the pool        r           cgs       ppp       s      .
    s is straw           p  EPDM     cgs  p-c- (D) -c-p  HcccccCW
    g is glazing         . rubber    cgs       (D)       s      .
    c is the cover       .           cgsp  -c- (D) -c-  pHcccccCW
    D are hot air ducts  .     20'   cgsp      (D)      ps      .
    rp is a reflecting pool          cgsp  -c- (D) -c-  pHcccccCW
    H is a hinge         .           cgs       (D)       s      .
    P is a post          .           cgs  p-c- (D) -c-p  HcccccCW
    CW is a counterweight.           cgs       ppp       s      .
                         .           cgsssssssssssssssssss      .
                         rprprprp----ccccccccccccccccccccHcccccCW

                         |<--  8' -->|<---     20'   --->|

Suppose that in winter, 1,000 Btu ft^2/day makes it into the single layer
flat polycarbonate glazing, augmented 50% by the frozen reflecting pool
on an average day in December. Then the solar energy input would be 

Ein = 1,000 x 1.5 x 4' x 20' = 120K Btu/day, 

Suppose that during 6 hours of sun on an average day in December,
the outdoor temp is 36 F, and the pool has some sort of R0 cover that
just prevents evaporation, and the air heater air and the pool water
have the same temperature T. 

Then the energy that flows out of the pool during an average December day is

Eout = 6 hours (T-36)  80 ft^2/R1   from the south glazing during the day
    + 18 hours (T-36)  80 ft^2/R20  from the south glazing at night
    + 24 hours (T-36) 400 ft^2/R20  up through the cover all day
    + 24 hours (T-36) 240 ft^2/R20  out through the ENW sides all day

     = (6x80/1 + 18x80/20 + 24x400/20 + 24x240/20) (T-36)

     = (480    +    72    +    480    +    288   ) (T-36)

     = 1320 (T-36), so if Ein = Eout for an average day, we have

1320 (T-36) = 120K or
  
          T = 36 + 120K/1320 = 126.9 degrees F.

Looks good... :-) Suppose we keep the pool at 106 F, eg by allowing some of
the average 30 gallons of rain per day that fall on the pool cover in PA to
flow through the pool and into the reflecting pool, which would keep the pool
cleaner with fewer chemicals. 

How much will the pool cool on a average December day with no sun?

Eout = 24 hours (106-36)  80 ft^2/R20  from the south glazing all day
     + 24 hours (106-36) 400 ft^2/R20  up through the cover all day
     + 24 hours (106-36) 240 ft^2/R20  out through the ENW sides all day

     = (24x70x80/20 + 24x70x400/20 + 24x70x240/20)

     = 6,720 + 33,600 + 20,160 = 60,480 Btu.

Since 1 pound of water loses 1 Btu when it cools 1 degree F, the pool temp
after a day without sun would be roughly 106 - 60,480/40,000 = 104.5 F.

How many 36 F days without sun would it take for the pool to reach 70 F?

The pool has a thermal resistance of R = R20/720 ft^2, so its RC time constant
is RC = R20/720x40,000 Btu/F = 1,111 hours or 46 days.

With no sun at all, and the cover closed, the pool temperature should be about

  T = 36 + (106 - 36) exp(-t/46), over many days, so if T = 70, 

 34 = 60 exp(-t/46), or 0.57 = exp(-t/46), or t = - 46 ln(0.57) = 26 days.

If it were 10 below zero outside for t days without any sun, the pool
might just begin to form a thin layer of ice on top when

 32 = -10 + (106-(-10)) exp(-t/46) ==> t = -46 ln(42/116) = 16.7 days.

Freezing it solid from top to bottom would take another 144 Btu/lb x 40K lb
= 5.76 million Btu, as the pool loses 36K Btu/day, not counting the thermal
resistance of the ice layer, ie at least another 159 days with no sun, at
minus 10 degrees F.

Nick

It's a snap to save energy in this country. As soon as more people become
involved in the basic math of heat transfer and get a gut-level, as well as
intellectual, grasp on how a house works, solution after solution will appear.

                                          Tom Smith 


From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Mon Mar 25 22:52:35 EST 1996
Article: 644 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,bit.listserv.geodesic,alt.architecture.alternative,pa.environment,sci.environment,alt.home.repair,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal
Subject: Re: Yet another solar heated swimming pool--a correction
Date: 25 Mar 1996 07:25:14 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <4j63ba$4e6@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
References: <4j45me$jmk@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47686 alt.energy.renewable:14648 bit.listserv.geodesic:4462 alt.architecture.alternative:6500 sci.environment:89003 alt.home.repair:20786 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5830 alt.solar.thermal:644

Seems like I have to go back and fix even the simplest things, even while they
are still on paper, which is a good time to do that. Perhaps this post should
have stewed for a couple of days before posting, but you know how it is when
you get excited about an idea, especially after a dozen espressos :-)

So here's the problem, in the following paragraph--not a large enough ratio of
thermal mass surface area to glazing surface area, in this solar closet. That
ratio should be 10:1 or so, to keep the temperature difference between the
air heater air and the thermal mass low, in this system with thermal mass
indirectly heated by warm air, and make the solar collection efficient, but
the glazing here is 80 is ft^2, and it's really equivalent to 120 ft^2 of
solar heat, with the reflecting pool, and the round pool sides are only 165
ft^2 and the pool bottom only has about 32 ft^2 of surface exposed to the sun-
warmed air, so that ratio is only 2.5:1, as posted. Nobody noticed this, altho
I did get some email from someone who said he "didn't do math," but we should
cover the top with PV and water heating panels and use antifreeze and pumps
and pipes buried in a radiant concrete floor slab under the pool :-)

Please change the following paragraph:

The straw bales under the pool itself could be spread apart to make 8 air
ducts, each 6" wide x 16" deep, running from north to south along the ground,
to allow solar-warmed air from the south glazing to travel across the top
of the pool, under the cover, down the north back wall of the pool, between
the pool and the bales, and under the pool from north to south. This might
work with passive plastic film gravity backdraft air dampers in holes at the
top and bottom of the straw bales behind the glazing, but a PV-powered (-:)
fan would make it work better. The whole ground area should be covered with
some sort of vapor barrier, eg poly film, to keep moisture out of the straw,
and the tops of the ducts below the pool should have some bridging, eg 1/8"
of newspaper with 3 layers of chicken wire on top of that, and an inch of sand
mix cement over that. Let's ignore the heat loss from the ducts to the ground. 

Here's a fix: forget the newspaper, make the ducts a foot wide, use 30 instead
of 40 straw bales under the pool and put in 100 concrete blocks with holes in
them, standing on end between the ground and the chicken wire ferrocement, to
act as fins to conduct heat up to the pool bottom. Each concrete block has a
surface area of about 6 ft^2 exposed to the warm air, so this way, we have 80
ft^2 of glazing and about 200 + 6*100 ft^2 of thermal mass surface area to
gather heat from the warm air, ie a nice 10:1 ratio. 

Nick



From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Mon Mar 25 22:53:53 EST 1996
Article: 646 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!rutgers!oitnews.harvard.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news4.ner.bbnplanet.net!news.ner.bbnplanet.net!news2.near.net!cocoa.brown.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,bit.listserv.geodesic,alt.architecture.alternative,pa.environment,sci.environment,alt.home.repair,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal
Subject: Re: Yet another solar heated swimming pool--enhancements
Date: 25 Mar 1996 13:32:52 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <4j6osk$a30@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
References: <4j45me$jmk@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <4j63ba$4e6@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47706 alt.energy.renewable:14654 bit.listserv.geodesic:4468 alt.architecture.alternative:6504 sci.environment:89077 alt.home.repair:20817 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5841 alt.solar.thermal:646

Nick Pine <nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> wrote:
 
>The straw bales under the pool itself could be spread apart to make 8 air
>ducts, each 6" wide x 16" deep, running from north to south...

>Here's a fix: forget the newspaper, make the ducts a foot wide, use 30 instead
>of 40 straw bales under the pool and put in 100 concrete blocks with holes in
>them, standing on end between the ground and the chicken wire ferrocement, to
>act as fins to conduct heat up to the pool bottom...

Better yet, forget the ducts and cement blocks and ferrocement, just build
the platform from strawbales and use a tiny pump and a 20' x 4' length of
SolaRoll, the EPDM rubber swimming pool tube-mat collector, under the south
edge vertical glazing.

Better yet, forget the store-bought pool and put a treated wood 2x4 frame
around the straw bales and line an 18' x 12' x 4' inner cavity with a single
piece of 20' wide EPDM rubber, folded up like a Chinese takeout box, so it
has no seams.

Better yet, make the solar collector out of another single piece of EPDM
rubber folded once into a 4' high x 12' long x 1" thick vertical V, with the
sides and top sealed in a 2x4 sandwich with silicone caulk between the rubber
sheets, a la Sven Tjernagel's 470 Pennsylvania site-built solar collectors,
(some still going strong), but vertical vs slanted, and filled with water,
vs a trickle down system, with some chicken wire under the north sides of
the 2x4 to limit the rubber bulging, and some glazing screwed to the south
sides of the 2x4s. 

Better yet, make an 20' wide x 16' long x 16' tall cube with 4 of these
20 x 8 x 8' boxes, using 2 16' long x 8' tall site-built EPDM collectors on
the south face, 2 6 gpm pumps each having an 8' head capability, and 4
internal water cavities, each 16' long x 8' wide x 6' deep, to store 24,576
gallons of water at 130 F, ie 10 million Btu of solar heat for a nearby house
for a whole cloudy winter. This might be nice under a 16' x 16' walkout deck,
on the west side of a house... If one were going to drink the water, the inner
tank liners might better be pond liner material, not EPDM, and the collectors
might contain propylene glycol "edible antifreeze," with a heat exchanger
inside the tanks. 

The pumps could be PV-powered of course. ("Bad move," says Sven Tjernagel :-)

Nick

It's a snap to save energy in this country. As soon as more people become
involved in the basic math of heat transfer and get a gut-level, as well as
intellectual, grasp on how a house works, solution after solution will appear.

                                          Tom Smith 


