7. |
What are the negative results for users in using an IFHOSP site? |
Average
Totally Irrelevant |
Extremely Relevant |
|
No. of Votes
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
Loss control of the choice of tools hosted on site |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.20
|
Decrease access to various data such as backups and logs from hosting server thus the ability of analysing this data was limited |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.9
|
No negative results |
|
1
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
7.16
|
More inertia in tool choice. If a new tool become available to replace an old one, it will be harder for an entire IFHOSP site to switch than a single project. |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.12
|
Limited tool customisation |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7.11
|
Loss control of the changes, quality and disappearing of toolset hosted |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.13
|
Increase of commitment due to the community expectation on a developer to work on a certain project |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7.17
|
Decreases tool knowledge depth. The administrative tasks related to running the tools yourself is also useful in using the tool. This knowledge is removed from the knowledge pool for your project unless somebody incidentally administer the tool elsewhere. |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.1
|
Lossing control over hosting uptimes and downtimes |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.4
|
Possible extra "collaboration" with unwanted parties ("back-seat programmers", trolls) |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.19
|
Users may hope an IFHSOP to implement new features and not to program them themselves. These features may never get implemented. |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7.18
|
Limitation placed on Intellectual Property rights. Depending on the license under which you get to use the IFHOSP, you may suddenly find that you've allowed licensing you hadn't planned. |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.2
|
Administrator(s) of IFHOSP may interfere with the development of project(s) |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.14
|
Possible confusion when trying to use an IFHOSP site |
|
6
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7.8
|
Low cost in setup will encourage starting unserious projects |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.7
|
Low cost in setup will encourage projects to be publish before they are ready |
|
7
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.6
|
Low cost in setup will encourage development of projects that are similar (reinvention of the wheel) |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.5
|
Low cost in setup will encourage forking of projects |
|
8
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7.15
|
Having to rely on one's self. There is no other party or company to put the blame on. |
|
6
|
|
Details |
| |
Answer from Previous Round |
|
|
|
6
|
|