perllexwarn - Perl Lexical Warnings


DESCRIPTION

       The `use warnings' pragma is a replacement for both the
       command line flag -w and the equivalent Perl variable,
       `$^W'.

       The pragma works just like the existing "strict" pragma.
       This means that the scope of the warning pragma is limited
       to the enclosing block. It also means that that the pragma
       setting will not leak across files (via `use', `require'
       or `do'). This allows authors to independently define the
       degree of warning checks that will be applied to their
       module.

       By default, optional warnings are disabled, so any legacy
       code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings will
       work unchanged.

       All warnings are enabled in a block by either of these:

           use warnings ;
           use warnings 'all' ;

       Similarly all warnings are disabled in a block by either
       of these:

           no warnings ;
           no warnings 'all' ;

       For example, consider the code below:

           use warnings ;
           my $a ;
           my $b ;
           {
               no warnings ;
               $b = 2 if $a EQ 3 ;
           }
           $b = 1 if $a NE 3 ;

       The code in the enclosing block has warnings enabled, but
       the inner block has them disabled. In this case that means
       that the use of the `EQ' operator won't trip a `"Use of EQ
       is deprecated"' warning, but the use of `NE' will produce
       a `"Use of NE is deprecated"' warning.

       Default Warnings and Optional Warnings

       Before the introduction of lexical warnings, Perl had two
       classes of warnings: mandatory and optional.

       As its name suggests, if your code tripped a mandatory

       not.  For example, the code below would always produce an
       `"isn't numeric"' warning about the "2:".

           my $a = "2:" + 3;

       With the introduction of lexical warnings, mandatory warn­
       ings now become default warnings. The difference is that
       although the previously mandatory warnings are still
       enabled by default, they can then be subsequently enabled
       or disabled with the lexical warning pragma. For example,
       in the code below, an `"isn't numeric"' warning will only
       be reported for the `$a' variable.

           my $a = "2:" + 3;
           no warnings ;
           my $b = "2:" + 3;

       Note that neither the -w flag or the `$^W' can be used to
       disable/enable default warnings. They are still mandatory
       in this case.

       What's wrong with -w and `$^W'

       Although very useful, the big problem with using -w on the
       command line to enable warnings is that it is all or noth­
       ing. Take the typical scenario when you are writing a Perl
       program. Parts of the code you will write yourself, but
       it's very likely that you will make use of pre-written
       Perl modules. If you use the -w flag in this case, you end
       up enabling warnings in pieces of code that you haven't
       written.

       Similarly, using `$^W' to either disable or enable blocks
       of code is fundamentally flawed. For a start, say you want
       to disable warnings in a block of code. You might expect
       this to be enough to do the trick:

            {
                local ($^W) = 0 ;
                my $a =+ 2 ;
                my $b ; chop $b ;
            }

       When this code is run with the -w flag, a warning will be
       produced for the `$a' line -- `"Reversed += operator"'.

       The problem is that Perl has both compile-time and run-
       time warnings. To disable compile-time warnings you need
       to rewrite the code like this:

                BEGIN { $^W = 0 }
                my $a =+ 2 ;
                my $b ; chop $b ;
            }

       The other big problem with `$^W' is that way you can inad­
       vertently change the warning setting in unexpected places
       in your code. For example, when the code below is run
       (without the -w flag), the second call to `doit' will trip
       a `"Use of uninitialized value"' warning, whereas the
       first will not.

           sub doit
           {
               my $b ; chop $b ;
           }

           doit() ;

           {
               local ($^W) = 1 ;
               doit()
           }

       This is a side-effect of `$^W' being dynamically scoped.

       Lexical warnings get around these limitations by allowing
       finer control over where warnings can or can't be tripped.

       Controlling Warnings from the Command Line

       There are three Command Line flags that can be used to
       control when warnings are (or aren't) produced:

       -w   This is  the existing flag. If the lexical warnings
            pragma is not used in any of you code, or any of the
            modules that you use, this flag will enable warnings
            everywhere. See the Backward Compatibility entry
            elsewhere in this document for details of how this
            flag interacts with lexical warnings.

       -W   If the -W flag is used on the command line, it will
            enable all warnings throughout the program regardless
            of whether warnings were disabled locally using `no
            warnings' or `$^W =0'. This includes all files that
            get included via `use', `require' or `do'.  Think of
            it as the Perl equivalent of the "lint" command.

       -X   Does the exact opposite to the -W flag, i.e. it dis­
            ables all warnings.


       If you are used with working with a version of Perl prior
       to the introduction of lexically scoped warnings, or have
       code that uses both lexical warnings and `$^W', this sec­
       tion will describe how they interact.

       How Lexical Warnings interact with -w/`$^W':

       1.   If none of the three command line flags (-w, -W or
            -X) that control warnings is used and neither `$^W'
            or the `warnings' pragma are used, then default warn­
            ings will be enabled and optional warnings disabled.
            This means that legacy code that doesn't attempt to
            control the warnings will work unchanged.

       2.   The -w flag just sets the global `$^W' variable as in
            5.005 -- this means that any legacy code that cur­
            rently relies on manipulating `$^W' to control warn­
            ing behavior will still work as is.

       3.   Apart from now being a boolean, the `$^W' variable
            operates in exactly the same horrible uncontrolled
            global way, except that it cannot disable/enable
            default warnings.

       4.   If a piece of code is under the control of the `warn­
            ings' pragma, both the `$^W' variable and the -w flag
            will be ignored for the scope of the lexical warning.

       5.   The only way to override a lexical warnings setting
            is with the -W or -X command line flags.

       The combined effect of 3 & 4 is that it will will allow
       code which uses the `warnings' pragma to control the warn­
       ing behavior of $^W-type code (using a `local $^W=0') if
       it really wants to, but not vice-versa.

       Category Hierarchy

       A hierarchy of "categories" have been defined to allow
       groups of warnings to be enabled/disabled in isolation.

       The current hierarchy is:

              |
              +- chmod
              |
              +- closure
              |
              +- exiting
              |
              +- glob
              |
              +- io -----------+
              |                |
              |                +- closed
              |                |
              |                +- exec
              |                |
              |                +- newline
              |                |
              |                +- pipe
              |                |
              |                +- unopened
              |
              +- misc
              |
              +- numeric
              |
              +- once
              |
              +- overflow
              |
              +- pack
              |
              +- portable
              |
              +- recursion
              |
              +- redefine
              |
              +- regexp
              |
              +- severe -------+
              |                |
              |                +- debugging
              |                |
              |                +- inplace
              |                |
              |                +- internal
              |                |
              |                +- malloc
              |
              +- signal
              |
              +- substr
              |

              |                |
              |                +- ambiguous
              |                |
              |                +- bareword
              |                |
              |                +- deprecated
              |                |
              |                +- digit
              |                |
              |                +- parenthesis
              |                |
              |                +- precedence
              |                |
              |                +- printf
              |                |
              |                +- prototype
              |                |
              |                +- qw
              |                |
              |                +- reserved
              |                |
              |                +- semicolon
              |
              +- taint
              |
              +- umask
              |
              +- uninitialized
              |
              +- unpack
              |
              +- untie
              |
              +- utf8
              |
              +- void
              |
              +- y2k

       Just like the "strict" pragma any of these categories can
       be combined

           use warnings qw(void redefine) ;
           no warnings qw(io syntax untie) ;

       Also like the "strict" pragma, if there is more than one
       instance of the `warnings' pragma in a given scope the
       cumulative effect is additive.

           ...
           use warnings qw(io) ;   # only "void" & "io" warnings enabled
           ...
           no warnings qw(void) ;  # only "io" warnings enabled

       To determine which category a specific warning has been
       assigned to see the perldiag manpage.

       Fatal Warnings

       The presence of the word "FATAL" in the category list will
       escalate any warnings detected from the categories speci­
       fied in the lexical scope into fatal errors. In the code
       below, there are 3 places where a deprecated warning will
       be detected, the middle one will produce a fatal error.

           use warnings ;

           $a = 1 if $a EQ $b ;

           {
               use warnings FATAL => qw(deprecated) ;
               $a = 1 if $a EQ $b ;
           }

           $a = 1 if $a EQ $b ;

       Reporting Warnings from a Module

       The `warnings' pragma provides a number of functions that
       are useful for module authors. These are used when you
       want to report a module-specific warning when the calling
       module has enabled warnings via the `warnings' pragma.

       Consider the module `MyMod::Abc' below.

           package MyMod::Abc;

           use warnings::register;

           sub open {
               my $path = shift ;
               if (warnings::enabled() && $path !~ m#^/#) {
                   warnings::warn("changing relative path to /tmp/");
                   $path = "/tmp/$path" ;
               }
           }

           1 ;

       The call to `warnings::register' will create a new warn­
       ings category called "MyMod::abc", i.e. the new category

       module will display a warning message if it gets given a
       relative path as a parameter. This warnings will only be
       displayed if the code that uses `MyMod::Abc' has actually
       enabled them with the `warnings' pragma like below.

           use MyMod::Abc;
           use warnings 'MyMod::Abc';
           ...
           abc::open("../fred.txt");

       It is also possible to test whether the pre-defined warn­
       ings categories are set in the calling module with the
       `warnings::enabled' function. Consider this snippet of
       code:

           package MyMod::Abc;

           sub open {
               if (warnings::enabled("deprecated")) {
                   warnings::warn("deprecated",
                                  "open is deprecated, use new instead") ;
               }
               new(@_) ;
           }

           sub new
           ...
           1 ;

       The function `open' has been deprecated, so code has been
       included to display a warning message whenever the calling
       module has (at least) the "deprecated" warnings category
       enabled. Something like this, say.

           use warnings 'deprecated';
           use MyMod::Abc;
           ...
           MyMod::Abc::open($filename) ;

       The `warnings::warn' function should be used to actually
       display the warnings message. This is because they can
       make use of the feature that allows warnings to be esca­
       lated into fatal errors. So in this case

           use MyMod::Abc;
           use warnings FATAL => 'MyMod::Abc';
           ...
           MyMod::Abc::open('../fred.txt');

       the `warnings::warn' function will detect this and die
       after displaying the warning message.

         perl5db.pl
           The debugger saves and restores C<$^W> at runtime. I haven't checked
           whether the debugger will still work with the lexical warnings
           patch applied.

         diagnostics.pm
           I *think* I've got diagnostics to work with the lexical warnings
           patch, but there were design decisions made in diagnostics to work
           around the limitations of C<$^W>. Now that those limitations are gone,
           the module should be revisited.


SEE ALSO

       the warnings manpage, the perldiag manpage.


AUTHOR

       Paul Marquess


Man(1) output converted with man2html