perlre - Perl regular expressions


DESCRIPTION

       This page describes the syntax of regular expressions in
       Perl.  For a description of how to use regular expressions
       in matching operations, plus various examples of the same,
       see discussions of `m//', `s///', `qr//' and `??' in the
       Regexp Quote-Like Operators entry in the perlop manpage.

       Matching operations can have various modifiers.  Modifiers
       that relate to the interpretation of the regular expres­
       sion inside are listed below.  Modifiers that alter the
       way a regular expression is used by Perl are detailed in
       the Regexp Quote-Like Operators entry in the perlop man­
       page and the Gory details of parsing quoted constructs
       entry in the perlop manpage.

       i   Do case-insensitive pattern matching.

           If `use locale' is in effect, the case map is taken
           from the current locale.  See the perllocale manpage.

       m   Treat string as multiple lines.  That is, change "^"
           and "$" from matching the start or end of the string
           to matching the start or end of any line anywhere
           within the string.

       s   Treat string as single line.  That is, change "." to
           match any character whatsoever, even a newline, which
           normally it would not match.

           The `/s' and `/m' modifiers both override the `$*'
           setting.  That is, no matter what `$*' contains, `/s'
           without `/m' will force "^" to match only at the
           beginning of the string and "$" to match only at the
           end (or just before a newline at the end) of the
           string.  Together, as /ms, they let the "." match any
           character whatsoever, while yet allowing "^" and "$"
           to match, respectively, just after and just before
           newlines within the string.

       x   Extend your pattern's legibility by permitting whites­
           pace and comments.

       These are usually written as "the `/x' modifier", even
       though the delimiter in question might not really be a
       slash.  Any of these modifiers may also be embedded within
       the regular expression itself using the `(?...)' con­
       struct.  See below.

       The `/x' modifier itself needs a little more explanation.
       It tells the regular expression parser to ignore whites­
       pace that is neither backslashed nor within a character

       sion into (slightly) more readable parts.  The `#' charac­
       ter is also treated as a metacharacter introducing a com­
       ment, just as in ordinary Perl code.  This also means that
       if you want real whitespace or `#' characters in the pat­
       tern (outside a character class, where they are unaffected
       by `/x'), that you'll either have to escape them or encode
       them using octal or hex escapes.  Taken together, these
       features go a long way towards making Perl's regular
       expressions more readable.  Note that you have to be care­
       ful not to include the pattern delimiter in the com­
       ment--perl has no way of knowing you did not intend to
       close the pattern early.  See the C-comment deletion code
       in the perlop manpage.

       Regular Expressions

       The patterns used in Perl pattern matching derive from
       supplied in the Version 8 regex routines.  (The routines
       are derived (distantly) from Henry Spencer's freely redis­
       tributable reimplementation of the V8 routines.)  See the
       Version 8 Regular Expressions entry elsewhere in this doc­
       ument for details.

       In particular the following metacharacters have their
       standard egrep-ish meanings:

           \   Quote the next metacharacter
           ^   Match the beginning of the line
           .   Match any character (except newline)
           $   Match the end of the line (or before newline at the end)
           |   Alternation
           ()  Grouping
           []  Character class

       By default, the "^" character is guaranteed to match only
       the beginning of the string, the "$" character only the
       end (or before the newline at the end), and Perl does cer­
       tain optimizations with the assumption that the string
       contains only one line.  Embedded newlines will not be
       matched by "^" or "$".  You may, however, wish to treat a
       string as a multi-line buffer, such that the "^" will
       match after any newline within the string, and "$" will
       match before any newline.  At the cost of a little more
       overhead, you can do this by using the /m modifier on the
       pattern match operator.  (Older programs did this by set­
       ting `$*', but this practice is now deprecated.)

       To simplify multi-line substitutions, the "." character
       never matches a newline unless you use the `/s' modifier,
       which in effect tells Perl to pretend the string is a sin­
       gle line--even if it isn't.  The `/s' modifier also over­
       rides the setting of `$*', in case you have some (badly
       behaved) older code that sets it in another module.


           *      Match 0 or more times
           +      Match 1 or more times
           ?      Match 1 or 0 times
           {n}    Match exactly n times
           {n,}   Match at least n times
           {n,m}  Match at least n but not more than m times

       (If a curly bracket occurs in any other context, it is
       treated as a regular character.)  The "*" modifier is
       equivalent to `{0,}', the "+" modifier to `{1,}', and the
       "?" modifier to `{0,1}'.  n and m are limited to integral
       values less than a preset limit defined when perl is
       built.  This is usually 32766 on the most common plat­
       forms.  The actual limit can be seen in the error message
       generated by code such as this:

           $_ **= $_ , / {$_} / for 2 .. 42;

       By default, a quantified subpattern is "greedy", that is,
       it will match as many times as possible (given a particu­
       lar starting location) while still allowing the rest of
       the pattern to match.  If you want it to match the minimum
       number of times possible, follow the quantifier with a
       "?".  Note that the meanings don't change, just the
       "greediness":

           *?     Match 0 or more times
           +?     Match 1 or more times
           ??     Match 0 or 1 time
           {n}?   Match exactly n times
           {n,}?  Match at least n times
           {n,m}? Match at least n but not more than m times

       Because patterns are processed as double quoted strings,
       the following also work:

           \n          newline               (LF, NL)
           \r          return                (CR)
           \f          form feed             (FF)
           \a          alarm (bell)          (BEL)
           \e          escape (think troff)  (ESC)
           \033        octal char (think of a PDP-11)
           \x1B        hex char
           \x{263a}    wide hex char         (Unicode SMILEY)
           \c[         control char
           \N{name}    named char
           \l          lowercase next char (think vi)
           \u          uppercase next char (think vi)
           \L          lowercase till \E (think vi)
           \U          uppercase till \E (think vi)
           \E          end case modification (think vi)
           \Q          quote (disable) pattern metacharacters till \E

       If `use locale' is in effect, the case map used by `\l',
       `\L', `\u' and `\U' is taken from the current locale.  See
       the perllocale manpage.  For documentation of `\N{name}',
       see the charnames manpage.

       You cannot include a literal `$' or `@' within a `\Q'
       sequence.  An unescaped `$' or `@' interpolates the corre­
       sponding variable, while escaping will cause the literal
       string `\$' to be matched.  You'll need to write something
       like `m/\Quser\E\@\Qhost/'.

       In addition, Perl defines the following:

           \w  Match a "word" character (alphanumeric plus "_")
           \W  Match a non-word character
           \s  Match a whitespace character
           \S  Match a non-whitespace character
           \d  Match a digit character
           \D  Match a non-digit character
           \pP Match P, named property.  Use \p{Prop} for longer names.
           \PP Match non-P
           \X  Match eXtended Unicode "combining character sequence",
               equivalent to C<(?:\PM\pM*)>
           \C  Match a single C char (octet) even under utf8.

       A `\w' matches a single alphanumeric character, not a
       whole word.  Use `\w+' to match a string of Perl-identi­
       fier characters (which isn't the same as matching an
       English word).  If `use locale' is in effect, the list of
       alphabetic characters generated by `\w' is taken from the
       current locale.  See the perllocale manpage.  You may use
       `\w', `\W', `\s', `\S', `\d', and `\D' within character
       classes, but if you try to use them as endpoints of a
       range, that's not a range, the "-" is understood liter­
       ally.  See the utf8 manpage for details about `\pP',
       `\PP', and `\X'.


           [:class:]

       is also available.  The available classes and their back­
       slash equivalents (if available) are as follows:

           alpha
           alnum
           ascii
           cntrl
           digit       \d
           graph
           lower
           print
           punct
           space       \s
           upper
           word        \w
           xdigit

       For example use `[:upper:]' to match all the uppercase
       characters.  Note that the `[]' are part of the `[::]'
       construct, not part of the whole character class.  For
       example:

           [01[:alpha:]%]

       matches one, zero, any alphabetic character, and the per­
       centage sign.

       If the `utf8' pragma is used, the following equivalences
       to Unicode \p{} constructs hold:

           alpha       IsAlpha
           alnum       IsAlnum
           ascii       IsASCII
           cntrl       IsCntrl
           digit       IsDigit
           graph       IsGraph
           lower       IsLower
           print       IsPrint
           punct       IsPunct
           space       IsSpace
           upper       IsUpper
           word        IsWord
           xdigit      IsXDigit

       For example `[:lower:]' and `\p{IsLower}' are equivalent.

       If the `utf8' pragma is not used but the `locale' pragma
       is, the classes correlate with the isalpha(3) interface
       (except for `word', which is a Perl extension, mirroring
       `\w').


       cntrl
           Any control character.  Usually characters that don't
           produce output as such but instead control the termi­
           nal somehow: for example newline and backspace are
           control characters.  All characters with ord() less
           than 32 are most often classified as control charac­
           ters.

       graph
           Any alphanumeric or punctuation character.

       print
           Any alphanumeric or punctuation character or space.

       punct
           Any punctuation character.

       xdigit
           Any hexadecimal digit.  Though this may feel silly
           (/0-9a-f/i would work just fine) it is included for
           completeness.

       You can negate the [::] character classes by prefixing the
       class name with a '^'. This is a Perl extension.  For
       example:

           POSIX       trad. Perl  utf8 Perl

           [:^digit:]      \D      \P{IsDigit}
           [:^space:]      \S      \P{IsSpace}
           [:^word:]       \W      \P{IsWord}

       The POSIX character classes [.cc.] and [=cc=] are recog­
       nized but not supported and trying to use them will cause
       an error.

       Perl defines the following zero-width assertions:

           \b  Match a word boundary
           \B  Match a non-(word boundary)
           \A  Match only at beginning of string
           \Z  Match only at end of string, or before newline at the end
           \z  Match only at end of string
           \G  Match only at pos() (e.g. at the end-of-match position
               of prior m//g)

       A word boundary (`\b') is a spot between two characters
       that has a `\w' on one side of it and a `\W' on the other
       side of it (in either order), counting the imaginary char­
       acters off the beginning and end of the string as matching
       a `\W'.  (Within character classes `\b' represents
       backspace rather than a word boundary, just as it normally

       just like "^" and "$", except that they won't match multi­
       ple times when the `/m' modifier is used, while "^" and
       "$" will match at every internal line boundary.  To match
       the actual end of the string and not ignore an optional
       trailing newline, use `\z'.

       The `\G' assertion can be used to chain global matches
       (using `m//g'), as described in the Regexp Quote-Like
       Operators entry in the perlop manpage.  It is also useful
       when writing `lex'-like scanners, when you have several
       patterns that you want to match against consequent sub­
       strings of your string, see the previous reference.  The
       actual location where `\G' will match can also be influ­
       enced by using `pos()' as an lvalue.  See the pos entry in
       the perlfunc manpage.

       The bracketing construct `( ... )' creates capture
       buffers.  To refer to the digit'th buffer use \<digit>
       within the match.  Outside the match use "$" instead of
       "\".  (The \<digit> notation works in certain circum­
       stances outside the match.  See the warning below about \1
       vs $1 for details.)  Referring back to another part of the
       match is called a backreference.

       There is no limit to the number of captured substrings
       that you may use.  However Perl also uses \10, \11, etc.
       as aliases for \010, \011, etc.  (Recall that 0 means
       octal, so \011 is the 9'th ASCII character, a tab.)  Perl
       resolves this ambiguity by interpreting \10 as a backref­
       erence only if at least 10 left parentheses have opened
       before it.  Likewise \11 is a backreference only if at
       least 11 left parentheses have opened before it.  And so
       on.  \1 through \9 are always interpreted as backrefer­
       ences."

       Examples:

           s/^([^ ]*) *([^ ]*)/$2 $1/;     # swap first two words

            if (/(.)\1/) {                 # find first doubled char
                print "'$1' is the first doubled character\n";
            }

           if (/Time: (..):(..):(..)/) {   # parse out values
               $hours = $1;
               $minutes = $2;
               $seconds = $3;
           }

       Several special variables also refer back to portions of
       the previous match.  `$+' returns whatever the last
       bracket match matched.  `$&' returns the entire matched
       string.  (At one point `$0' did also, but now it returns

       the matched string.  And `$'' returns everything after the
       matched string.

       The numbered variables ($1, $2, $3, etc.) and the related
       punctuation set (`<$+', `$&', `$`', and `$'') are all
       dynamically scoped until the end of the enclosing block or
       until the next successful match, whichever comes first.
       (See the Compound Statements entry in the perlsyn man­
       page.)

       WARNING: Once Perl sees that you need one of `$&', `$`',
       or `$'' anywhere in the program, it has to provide them
       for every pattern match.  This may substantially slow your
       program.  Perl uses the same mechanism to produce $1, $2,
       etc, so you also pay a price for each pattern that con­
       tains capturing parentheses.  (To avoid this cost while
       retaining the grouping behaviour, use the extended regular
       expression `(?: ... )' instead.)  But if you never use
       `$&', `$`' or `$'', then patterns without capturing paren­
       theses will not be penalized.  So avoid `$&', `$'', and
       `$`' if you can, but if you can't (and some algorithms
       really appreciate them), once you've used them once, use
       them at will, because you've already paid the price.  As
       of 5.005, `$&' is not so costly as the other two.

       Backslashed metacharacters in Perl are alphanumeric, such
       as `\b', `\w', `\n'.  Unlike some other regular expression
       languages, there are no backslashed symbols that aren't
       alphanumeric.  So anything that looks like \\, \(, \), \<,
       \>, \{, or \} is always interpreted as a literal charac­
       ter, not a metacharacter.  This was once used in a common
       idiom to disable or quote the special meanings of regular
       expression metacharacters in a string that you want to use
       for a pattern. Simply quote all non-alphanumeric charac­
       ters:

           $pattern =~ s/(\W)/\\$1/g;

       Today it is more common to use the quotemeta() function or
       the `\Q' metaquoting escape sequence to disable all
       metacharacters' special meanings like this:

           /$unquoted\Q$quoted\E$unquoted/

       Beware that if you put literal backslashes (those not
       inside interpolated variables) between `\Q' and `\E', dou­
       ble-quotish backslash interpolation may lead to confusing
       results.  If you need to use literal backslashes within
       `\Q...\E', consult the Gory details of parsing quoted con­
       structs entry in the perlop manpage.


       Perl also defines a consistent extension syntax for fea­
       tures not found in standard tools like awk and lex.  The
       syntax is a pair of parentheses with a question mark as
       the first thing within the parentheses.  The character
       after the question mark indicates the extension.

       The stability of these extensions varies widely.  Some
       have been part of the core language for many years.  Oth­
       ers are experimental and may change without warning or be
       completely removed.  Check the documentation on an indi­
       vidual feature to verify its current status.

       A question mark was chosen for this and for the minimal-
       matching construct because 1) question marks are rare in
       older regular expressions, and 2) whenever you see one,
       you should stop and "question" exactly what is going on.
       That's psychology...

       `(?#text)'
                 A comment.  The text is ignored.  If the `/x'
                 modifier enables whitespace formatting, a simple
                 `#' will suffice.  Note that Perl closes the
                 comment as soon as it sees a `)', so there is no
                 way to put a literal `)' in the comment.

       `(?imsx-imsx)'
                 One or more embedded pattern-match modifiers.
                 This is particularly useful for dynamic pat­
                 terns, such as those read in from a configura­
                 tion file, read in as an argument, are specified
                 in a table somewhere, etc.  Consider the case
                 that some of which want to be case sensitive and
                 some do not.  The case insensitive ones need to
                 include merely `(?i)' at the front of the pat­
                 tern.  For example:

                     $pattern = "foobar";
                     if ( /$pattern/i ) { }

                     # more flexible:

                     $pattern = "(?i)foobar";
                     if ( /$pattern/ ) { }

                 Letters after a `-' turn those modifiers off.
                 These modifiers are localized inside an enclos­
                 ing group (if any).  For example,

                     ( (?i) blah ) \s+ \1

                 will match a repeated (including the case!) word
                 `blah' in any case, assuming `x' modifier, and


       `(?:pattern)'

       `(?imsx-imsx:pattern)'
                 This is for clustering, not capturing; it groups
                 subexpressions like "()", but doesn't make back­
                 references as "()" does.  So

                     @fields = split(/\b(?:a|b|c)\b/)

                 is like

                     @fields = split(/\b(a|b|c)\b/)

                 but doesn't spit out extra fields.  It's also
                 cheaper not to capture characters if you don't
                 need to.

                 Any letters between `?' and `:' act as flags
                 modifiers as with `(?imsx-imsx)'.  For example,

                     /(?s-i:more.*than).*million/i

                 is equivalent to the more verbose

                     /(?:(?s-i)more.*than).*million/i

       `(?=pattern)'
                 A zero-width positive look-ahead assertion.  For
                 example, `/\w+(?=\t)/' matches a word followed
                 by a tab, without including the tab in `$&'.

       `(?!pattern)'
                 A zero-width negative look-ahead assertion.  For
                 example `/foo(?!bar)/' matches any occurrence of
                 "foo" that isn't followed by "bar".  Note how­
                 ever that look-ahead and look-behind are NOT the
                 same thing.  You cannot use this for look-
                 behind.

                 If you are looking for a "bar" that isn't pre­
                 ceded by a "foo", `/(?!foo)bar/' will not do
                 what you want.  That's because the `(?!foo)' is
                 just saying that the next thing cannot be
                 "foo"--and it's not, it's a "bar", so "foobar"
                 will match.  You would have to do something like
                 `/(?!foo)...bar/' for that.   We say "like"
                 because there's the case of your "bar" not hav­
                 ing three characters before it.  You could cover
                 that this way: `/(?:(?!foo)...|^.{0,2})bar/'.
                 Sometimes it's still easier just to say:


                 For look-behind see below.

       `(?<=pattern)'
                 A zero-width positive look-behind assertion.
                 For example, `/(?<=\t)\w+/' matches a word that
                 follows a tab, without including the tab in
                 `$&'.  Works only for fixed-width look-behind.

       `(?<!pattern)'
                 A zero-width negative look-behind assertion.
                 For example `/(?<!bar)foo/' matches any occur­
                 rence of "foo" that does not follow "bar".
                 Works only for fixed-width look-behind.

       `(?{ code })'
                 WARNING: This extended regular expression fea­
                 ture is considered highly experimental, and may
                 be changed or deleted without notice.

                 This zero-width assertion evaluate any embedded
                 Perl code.  It always succeeds, and its `code'
                 is not interpolated.  Currently, the rules to
                 determine where the `code' ends are somewhat
                 convoluted.

                 The `code' is properly scoped in the following
                 sense: If the assertion is backtracked (compare
                 the section on "Backtracking"), all changes
                 introduced after `local'ization are undone, so
                 that

                   $_ = 'a' x 8;
                   m<
                      (?{ $cnt = 0 })                    # Initialize $cnt.
                      (
                        a
                        (?{
                            local $cnt = $cnt + 1;       # Update $cnt, backtracking-safe.
                        })
                      )*
                      aaaa
                      (?{ $res = $cnt })                 # On success copy to non-localized
                                                         # location.
                    >x;

                 will set `$res = 4'.  Note that after the match,
                 $cnt returns to the globally introduced value,
                 because the scopes that restrict `local' opera­
                 tors are unwound.

                 This assertion may be used as a `(?(condi­
                 tion)yes-pattern|no-pattern)' switch.  If not

                 `code' is put into the special variable `$^R'.
                 This happens immediately, so `$^R' can be used
                 from other `(?{ code })' assertions inside the
                 same regular expression.

                 The assignment to `$^R' above is properly local­
                 ized, so the old value of `$^R' is restored if
                 the assertion is backtracked; compare the sec­
                 tion on "Backtracking".

                 For reasons of security, this construct is for­
                 bidden if the regular expression involves run-
                 time interpolation of variables, unless the per­
                 ilous `use re 'eval'' pragma has been used (see
                 the re manpage), or the variables contain
                 results of `qr//' operator (see the
                 qr/STRING/imosx entry in the perlop manpage).

                 This restriction is because of the wide-spread
                 and remarkably convenient custom of using run-
                 time determined strings as patterns.  For exam­
                 ple:

                     $re = <>;
                     chomp $re;
                     $string =~ /$re/;

                 Before Perl knew how to execute interpolated
                 code within a pattern, this operation was com­
                 pletely safe from a security point of view,
                 although it could raise an exception from an
                 illegal pattern.  If you turn on the `use re
                 'eval'', though, it is no longer secure, so you
                 should only do so if you are also using taint
                 checking.  Better yet, use the carefully con­
                 strained evaluation within a Safe module.  See
                 the perlsec manpage for details about both these
                 mechanisms.

       `(??{ code })'
                 WARNING: This extended regular expression fea­
                 ture is considered highly experimental, and may
                 be changed or deleted without notice.  A simpli­
                 fied version of the syntax may be introduced for
                 commonly used idioms.

                 This is a "postponed" regular subexpression.
                 The `code' is evaluated at run time, at the
                 moment this subexpression may match.  The result
                 of evaluation is considered as a regular expres­
                 sion and matched as if it were inserted instead
                 of this construct.

                 rules to determine where the `code' ends are
                 currently somewhat convoluted.

                 The following pattern matches a parenthesized
                 group:

                   $re = qr{
                              \(
                              (?:
                                 (?> [^()]+ )    # Non-parens without backtracking
                               |
                                 (??{ $re })     # Group with matching parens
                              )*
                              \)
                           }x;

       `(?>pattern)'
                 WARNING: This extended regular expression fea­
                 ture is considered highly experimental, and may
                 be changed or deleted without notice.

                 An "independent" subexpression, one which
                 matches the substring that a standalone `pat­
                 tern' would match if anchored at the given posi­
                 tion, and it matches nothing other than this
                 substring.  This construct is useful for opti­
                 mizations of what would otherwise be "eternal"
                 matches, because it will not backtrack (see the
                 section on "Backtracking").  It may also be use­
                 ful in places where the "grab all you can, and
                 do not give anything back" semantic is desir­
                 able.

                 For example: `^(?>a*)ab' will never match, since
                 `(?>a*)' (anchored at the beginning of string,
                 as above) will match all characters `a' at the
                 beginning of string, leaving no `a' for `ab' to
                 match.  In contrast, `a*ab' will match the same
                 as `a+b', since the match of the subgroup `a*'
                 is influenced by the following group `ab' (see
                 the section on "Backtracking").  In particular,
                 `a*' inside `a*ab' will match fewer characters
                 than a standalone `a*', since this makes the
                 tail match.

                 An effect similar to `(?>pattern)' may be
                 achieved by writing `(?=(pattern))\1'.  This
                 matches the same substring as a standalone `a+',
                 and the following `\1' eats the matched string;
                 it therefore makes a zero-length assertion into
                 an analogue of `(?>...)'.  (The difference
                 between these two constructs is that the second

                 nals of backreferences in the rest of a regular
                 expression.)

                 Consider this pattern:

                     m{ \(
                           (
                             [^()]+              # x+
                           |
                             \( [^()]* \)
                           )+
                        \)
                      }x

                 That will efficiently match a nonempty group
                 with matching parentheses two levels deep or
                 less.  However, if there is no such group, it
                 will take virtually forever on a long string.
                 That's because there are so many different ways
                 to split a long string into several substrings.
                 This is what `(.+)+' is doing, and `(.+)+' is
                 similar to a subpattern of the above pattern.
                 Consider how the pattern above detects no-match
                 on `((()aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' in several seconds,
                 but that each extra letter doubles this time.
                 This exponential performance will make it appear
                 that your program has hung.  However, a tiny
                 change to this pattern

                     m{ \(
                           (
                             (?> [^()]+ )        # change x+ above to (?> x+ )
                           |
                             \( [^()]* \)
                           )+
                        \)
                      }x

                 which uses `(?>...)' matches exactly when the
                 one above does (verifying this yourself would be
                 a productive exercise), but finishes in a fourth
                 the time when used on a similar string with
                 1000000 `a's.  Be aware, however, that this pat­
                 tern currently triggers a warning message under
                 the `use warnings' pragma or -w switch saying it
                 `"matches the null string many times"'):

                 On simple groups, such as the pattern `(?>
                 [^()]+ )', a comparable effect may be achieved
                 by negative look-ahead, as in `[^()]+ (?! [^()]
                 )'.  This was only 4 times slower on a string
                 with 1000000 `a's.

                 back" semantic is desirable in many situations
                 where on the first sight a simple `()*' looks
                 like the correct solution.  Suppose we parse
                 text with comments being delimited by `#' fol­
                 lowed by some optional (horizontal) whitespace.
                 Contrary to its appearence, `#[ \t]*' is not the
                 correct subexpression to match the comment
                 delimiter, because it may "give up" some whites­
                 pace if the remainder of the pattern can be made
                 to match that way.  The correct answer is either
                 one of these:

                     (?>#[ \t]*)
                     #[ \t]*(?![ \t])

                 For example, to grab non-empty comments into $1,
                 one should use either one of these:

                     / (?> \# [ \t]* ) (        .+ ) /x;
                     /     \# [ \t]*   ( [^ \t] .* ) /x;

                 Which one you pick depends on which of these
                 expressions better reflects the above specifica­
                 tion of comments.

       `(?(condition)yes-pattern|no-pattern)'

       `(?(condition)yes-pattern)'
                 WARNING: This extended regular expression fea­
                 ture is considered highly experimental, and may
                 be changed or deleted without notice.

                 Conditional expression.  `(condition)' should be
                 either an integer in parentheses (which is valid
                 if the corresponding pair of parentheses
                 matched), or look-ahead/look-behind/evaluate
                 zero-width assertion.

                 For example:

                     m{ ( \( )?
                        [^()]+
                        (?(1) \) )
                      }x

                 matches a chunk of non-parentheses, possibly
                 included in parentheses themselves.

       Backtracking

       NOTE: This section presents an abstract approximation of
       regular expression behavior.  For a more rigorous (and
       complicated) view of the rules involved in selecting a

       pieces together entry elsewhere in this document.

       A fundamental feature of regular expression matching
       involves the notion called backtracking, which is cur­
       rently used (when needed) by all regular expression quan­
       tifiers, namely `*', `*?', `+', `+?', `{n,m}', and
       `{n,m}?'.  Backtracking is often optimized internally, but
       the general principle outlined here is valid.

       For a regular expression to match, the entire regular
       expression must match, not just part of it.  So if the
       beginning of a pattern containing a quantifier succeeds in
       a way that causes later parts in the pattern to fail, the
       matching engine backs up and recalculates the beginning
       part--that's why it's called backtracking.

       Here is an example of backtracking:  Let's say you want to
       find the word following "foo" in the string "Food is on
       the foo table.":

           $_ = "Food is on the foo table.";
           if ( /\b(foo)\s+(\w+)/i ) {
               print "$2 follows $1.\n";
           }

       When the match runs, the first part of the regular expres­
       sion (`\b(foo)') finds a possible match right at the
       beginning of the string, and loads up $1 with "Foo".  How­
       ever, as soon as the matching engine sees that there's no
       whitespace following the "Foo" that it had saved in $1, it
       realizes its mistake and starts over again one character
       after where it had the tentative match.  This time it goes
       all the way until the next occurrence of "foo". The com­
       plete regular expression matches this time, and you get
       the expected output of "table follows foo."

       Sometimes minimal matching can help a lot.  Imagine you'd
       like to match everything between "foo" and "bar".  Ini­
       tially, you write something like this:

           $_ =  "The food is under the bar in the barn.";
           if ( /foo(.*)bar/ ) {
               print "got <$1>\n";
           }

       Which perhaps unexpectedly yields:

         got <d is under the bar in the >

       That's because `.*' was greedy, so you get everything
       between the first "foo" and the last "bar".  Here it's
       more effective to use minimal matching to make sure you
       get the text between a "foo" and the first "bar"


           if ( /foo(.*?)bar/ ) { print "got <$1>\n" }
         got <d is under the >

       Here's another example: let's say you'd like to match a
       number at the end of a string, and you also want to keep
       the preceding part the match.  So you write this:

           $_ = "I have 2 numbers: 53147";
           if ( /(.*)(\d*)/ ) {                                # Wrong!
               print "Beginning is <$1>, number is <$2>.\n";
           }

       That won't work at all, because `.*' was greedy and gob­
       bled up the whole string. As `\d*' can match on an empty
       string the complete regular expression matched success­
       fully.

           Beginning is <I have 2 numbers: 53147>, number is <>.

       Here are some variants, most of which don't work:

           $_ = "I have 2 numbers: 53147";
           @pats = qw{
               (.*)(\d*)
               (.*)(\d+)
               (.*?)(\d*)
               (.*?)(\d+)
               (.*)(\d+)$
               (.*?)(\d+)$
               (.*)\b(\d+)$
               (.*\D)(\d+)$
           };

           for $pat (@pats) {
               printf "%-12s ", $pat;
               if ( /$pat/ ) {
                   print "<$1> <$2>\n";
               } else {
                   print "FAIL\n";
               }
           }

       That will print out:

           (.*)(\d*)    <I have 2 numbers: 53147> <>
           (.*)(\d+)    <I have 2 numbers: 5314> <7>
           (.*?)(\d*)   <> <>
           (.*?)(\d+)   <I have > <2>
           (.*)(\d+)$   <I have 2 numbers: 5314> <7>
           (.*?)(\d+)$  <I have 2 numbers: > <53147>
           (.*)\b(\d+)$ <I have 2 numbers: > <53147>
           (.*\D)(\d+)$ <I have 2 numbers: > <53147>

       realize that a regular expression is merely a set of
       assertions that gives a definition of success.  There may
       be 0, 1, or several different ways that the definition
       might succeed against a particular string.  And if there
       are multiple ways it might succeed, you need to understand
       backtracking to know which variety of success you will
       achieve.

       When using look-ahead assertions and negations, this can
       all get even tricker.  Imagine you'd like to find a
       sequence of non-digits not followed by "123".  You might
       try to write that as

           $_ = "ABC123";
           if ( /^\D*(?!123)/ ) {              # Wrong!
               print "Yup, no 123 in $_\n";
           }

       But that isn't going to match; at least, not the way
       you're hoping.  It claims that there is no 123 in the
       string.  Here's a clearer picture of why it that pattern
       matches, contrary to popular expectations:

           $x = 'ABC123' ;
           $y = 'ABC445' ;

           print "1: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/ ;
           print "2: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/ ;

           print "3: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/ ;
           print "4: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/ ;

       This prints

           2: got ABC
           3: got AB
           4: got ABC

       You might have expected test 3 to fail because it seems to
       a more general purpose version of test 1.  The important
       difference between them is that test 3 contains a quanti­
       fier (`\D*') and so can use backtracking, whereas test 1
       will not.  What's happening is that you've asked "Is it
       true that at the start of $x, following 0 or more non-dig­
       its, you have something that's not 123?"  If the pattern
       matcher had let `\D*' expand to "ABC", this would have
       caused the whole pattern to fail.

       The search engine will initially match `\D*' with "ABC".
       Then it will try to match `(?!123' with "123", which
       fails.  But because a quantifier (`\D*') has been used in
       the regular expression, the search engine can backtrack
       and retry the match differently in the hope of matching


       The pattern really, really wants to succeed, so it uses
       the standard pattern back-off-and-retry and lets `\D*'
       expand to just "AB" this time.  Now there's indeed some­
       thing following "AB" that is not "123".  It's "C123",
       which suffices.

       We can deal with this by using both an assertion and a
       negation.  We'll say that the first part in $1 must be
       followed both by a digit and by something that's not
       "123".  Remember that the look-aheads are zero-width
       expressions--they only look, but don't consume any of the
       string in their match.  So rewriting this way produces
       what you'd expect; that is, case 5 will fail, but case 6
       succeeds:

           print "5: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/ ;
           print "6: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/ ;

           6: got ABC

       In other words, the two zero-width assertions next to each
       other work as though they're ANDed together, just as you'd
       use any built-in assertions:  `/^$/' matches only if
       you're at the beginning of the line AND the end of the
       line simultaneously.  The deeper underlying truth is that
       juxtaposition in regular expressions always means AND,
       except when you write an explicit OR using the vertical
       bar.  `/ab/' means match "a" AND (then) match "b",
       although the attempted matches are made at different posi­
       tions because "a" is not a zero-width assertion, but a
       one-width assertion.

       WARNING: particularly complicated regular expressions can
       take exponential time to solve because of the immense num­
       ber of possible ways they can use backtracking to try
       match.  For example, without internal optimizations done
       by the regular expression engine, this will take a
       painfully long time to run:

           'aaaaaaaaaaaa' =~ /((a{0,5}){0,5}){0,5}[c]/

       And if you used `*''s instead of limiting it to 0 through
       5 matches, then it would take forever--or until you ran
       out of stack space.

       A powerful tool for optimizing such beasts is what is
       known as an "independent group", which does not backtrack
       (see the section on "`(?>pattern)'").  Note also that
       zero-length look-ahead/look-behind assertions will not
       backtrack to make the tail match, since they are in "logi­
       cal" context: only whether they match is considered rele­
       vant.  For an example where side-effects of look-ahead

       on "`(?>pattern)'".

       Version 8 Regular Expressions

       In case you're not familiar with the "regular" Version 8
       regex routines, here are the pattern-matching rules not
       described above.

       Any single character matches itself, unless it is a
       metacharacter with a special meaning described here or
       above.  You can cause characters that normally function as
       metacharacters to be interpreted literally by prefixing
       them with a "\" (e.g., "\." matches a ".", not any charac­
       ter; "\\" matches a "\").  A series of characters matches
       that series of characters in the target string, so the
       pattern `blurfl' would match "blurfl" in the target
       string.

       You can specify a character class, by enclosing a list of
       characters in `[]', which will match any one character
       from the list.  If the first character after the "[" is
       "^", the class matches any character not in the list.
       Within a list, the "-" character specifies a range, so
       that `a-z' represents all characters between "a" and "z",
       inclusive.  If you want either "-" or "]" itself to be a
       member of a class, put it at the start of the list (possi­
       bly after a "^"), or escape it with a backslash.  "-" is
       also taken literally when it is at the end of the list,
       just before the closing "]".  (The following all specify
       the same class of three characters: `[-az]', `[az-]', and
       `[a\-z]'.  All are different from `[a-z]', which specifies
       a class containing twenty-six characters.)  Also, if you
       try to use the character classes `\w', `\W', `\s', `\S',
       `\d', or `\D' as endpoints of a range, that's not a range,
       the "-" is understood literally.

       Note also that the whole range idea is rather unportable
       between character sets--and even within character sets
       they may cause results you probably didn't expect.  A
       sound principle is to use only ranges that begin from and
       end at either alphabets of equal case ([a-e], [A-E]), or
       digits ([0-9]).  Anything else is unsafe.  If in doubt,
       spell out the character sets in full.

       Characters may be specified using a metacharacter syntax
       much like that used in C: "\n" matches a newline, "\t" a
       tab, "\r" a carriage return, "\f" a form feed, etc.  More
       generally, \nnn, where nnn is a string of octal digits,
       matches the character whose ASCII value is nnn.  Simi­
       larly, \xnn, where nn are hexadecimal digits, matches the
       character whose ASCII value is nn. The expression \cx
       matches the ASCII character control-x.  Finally, the "."
       metacharacter matches any character except "\n" (unless


       You can specify a series of alternatives for a pattern
       using "|" to separate them, so that `fee|fie|foe' will
       match any of "fee", "fie", or "foe" in the target string
       (as would `f(e|i|o)e').  The first alternative includes
       everything from the last pattern delimiter ("(", "[", or
       the beginning of the pattern) up to the first "|", and the
       last alternative contains everything from the last "|" to
       the next pattern delimiter.  That's why it's common prac­
       tice to include alternatives in parentheses: to minimize
       confusion about where they start and end.

       Alternatives are tried from left to right, so the first
       alternative found for which the entire expression matches,
       is the one that is chosen. This means that alternatives
       are not necessarily greedy. For example: when matching
       `foo|foot' against "barefoot", only the "foo" part will
       match, as that is the first alternative tried, and it suc­
       cessfully matches the target string. (This might not seem
       important, but it is important when you are capturing
       matched text using parentheses.)

       Also remember that "|" is interpreted as a literal within
       square brackets, so if you write `[fee|fie|foe]' you're
       really only matching `[feio|]'.

       Within a pattern, you may designate subpatterns for later
       reference by enclosing them in parentheses, and you may
       refer back to the nth subpattern later in the pattern
       using the metacharacter \n.  Subpatterns are numbered
       based on the left to right order of their opening paren­
       thesis.  A backreference matches whatever actually matched
       the subpattern in the string being examined, not the rules
       for that subpattern.  Therefore, `(0|0x)\d*\s\1\d*' will
       match "0x1234 0x4321", but not "0x1234 01234", because
       subpattern 1 matched "0x", even though the rule `0|0x'
       could potentially match the leading 0 in the second num­
       ber.

       Warning on \1 vs $1

       Some people get too used to writing things like:

           $pattern =~ s/(\W)/\\\1/g;

       This is grandfathered for the RHS of a substitute to avoid
       shocking the sed addicts, but it's a dirty habit to get
       into.  That's because in PerlThink, the righthand side of
       a `s///' is a double-quoted string.  `\1' in the usual
       double-quoted string means a control-A.  The customary
       Unix meaning of `\1' is kludged in for `s///'.  However,
       if you get into the habit of doing that, you get yourself
       into trouble if you then add an `/e' modifier.


       Or if you try to do

           s/(\d+)/\1000/;

       You can't disambiguate that by saying `\{1}000', whereas
       you can fix it with `${1}000'.  The operation of interpo­
       lation should not be confused with the operation of match­
       ing a backreference.  Certainly they mean two different
       things on the left side of the `s///'.

       Repeated patterns matching zero-length substring

       WARNING: Difficult material (and prose) ahead.  This sec­
       tion needs a rewrite.

       Regular expressions provide a terse and powerful program­
       ming language.  As with most other power tools, power
       comes together with the ability to wreak havoc.

       A common abuse of this power stems from the ability to
       make infinite loops using regular expressions, with some­
       thing as innocuous as:

           'foo' =~ m{ ( o? )* }x;

       The `o?' can match at the beginning of `'foo'', and since
       the position in the string is not moved by the match, `o?'
       would match again and again because of the `*' modifier.
       Another common way to create a similar cycle is with the
       looping modifier `//g':

           @matches = ( 'foo' =~ m{ o? }xg );

       or

           print "match: <$&>\n" while 'foo' =~ m{ o? }xg;

       or the loop implied by split().

       However, long experience has shown that many programming
       tasks may be significantly simplified by using repeated
       subexpressions that may match zero-length substrings.
       Here's a simple example being:

           @chars = split //, $string;           # // is not magic in split
           ($whitewashed = $string) =~ s/()/ /g; # parens avoid magic s// /

       Thus Perl allows such constructs, by forcefully breaking
       the infinite loop.  The rules for this are different for
       lower-level loops given by the greedy modifiers `*+{}',
       and for higher-level ones like the `/g' modifier or
       split() operator.

       is broken) when Perl detects that a repeated expression
       matched a zero-length substring.   Thus

          m{ (?: NON_ZERO_LENGTH | ZERO_LENGTH )* }x;

       is made equivalent to

          m{   (?: NON_ZERO_LENGTH )*
             |
               (?: ZERO_LENGTH )?
           }x;

       The higher level-loops preserve an additional state
       between iterations: whether the last match was zero-
       length.  To break the loop, the following match after a
       zero-length match is prohibited to have a length of zero.
       This prohibition interacts with backtracking (see the sec­
       tion on "Backtracking"), and so the second best match is
       chosen if the best match is of zero length.

       For example:

           $_ = 'bar';
           s/\w??/<$&>/g;

       results in `"<'second best match is what is
       matched by `\w'.  Thus zero-length matches alternate with
       one-character-long matches.

       Similarly, for repeated `m/()/g' the second-best match is
       the match at the position one notch further in the string.

       The additional state of being matched with zero-length is
       associated with the matched string, and is reset by each
       assignment to pos().  Zero-length matches at the end of
       the previous match are ignored during `split'.

       Combining pieces together

       Each of the elementary pieces of regular expressions which
       were described before (such as `ab' or `\Z') could match
       at most one substring at the given position of the input
       string.  However, in a typical regular expression these
       elementary pieces are combined into more complicated pat­
       terns using combining operators `ST', `S|T', `S*' etc (in
       these examples `S' and `T' are regular subexpressions).

       Such combinations can include alternatives, leading to a
       problem of choice: if we match a regular expression `a|ab'
       against `"abc"', will it match substring `"a"' or `"ab"'?
       One way to describe which substring is actually matched is

       tracking").  However, this description is too low-level
       and makes you think in terms of a particular implementa­
       tion.

       Another description starts with notions of "bet­
       ter"/"worse".  All the substrings which may be matched by
       the given regular expression can be sorted from the "best"
       match to the "worst" match, and it is the "best" match
       which is chosen.  This substitutes the question of "what
       is chosen?"  by the question of "which matches are better,
       and which are worse?".

       Again, for elementary pieces there is no such question,
       since at most one match at a given position is possible.
       This section describes the notion of better/worse for com­
       bining operators.  In the description below `S' and `T'
       are regular subexpressions.

       `ST'
           Consider two possible matches, `AB' and `A'B'', `A'
           and `A'' are substrings which can be matched by `S',
           `B' and `B'' are substrings which can be matched by
           `T'.

           If `A' is better match for `S' than `A'', `AB' is a
           better match than `A'B''.

           If `A' and `A'' coincide: `AB' is a better match than
           `AB'' if `B' is better match for `T' than `B''.

       `S|T'
           When `S' can match, it is a better match than when
           only `T' can match.

           Ordering of two matches for `S' is the same as for
           `S'.  Similar for two matches for `T'.

       `S{REPEAT_COUNT}'
           Matches as `SSS...S' (repeated as many times as neces­
           sary).

       `S{min,max}'
           Matches as `S{max}|S{max-1}|...|S{min+1}|S{min}'.

       `S{min,max}?'
           Matches as `S{min}|S{min+1}|...|S{max-1}|S{max}'.

       `S?', `S*', `S+'
           Same as `S{0,1}', `S{0,BIG_NUMBER}', `S{1,BIG_NUMBER}'
           respectively.

       `S??', `S*?', `S+?'
           Same as `S{0,1}?', `S{0,BIG_NUMBER}?',


       `(?>S)'
           Matches the best match for `S' and only that.

       `(?=S)', `(?<=S)'
           Only the best match for `S' is considered.  (This is
           important only if `S' has capturing parentheses, and
           backreferences are used somewhere else in the whole
           regular expression.)

       `(?!S)', `(?<!S)'
           For this grouping operator there is no need to
           describe the ordering, since only whether or not `S'
           can match is important.

       `(??{ EXPR })'
           The ordering is the same as for the regular expression
           which is the result of EXPR.

       `(?(condition)yes-pattern|no-pattern)'
           Recall that which of `yes-pattern' or `no-pattern'
           actually matches is already determined.  The ordering
           of the matches is the same as for the chosen subex­
           pression.

       The above recipes describe the ordering of matches at a
       given position.  One more rule is needed to understand how
       a match is determined for the whole regular expression: a
       match at an earlier position is always better than a match
       at a later position.

       Creating custom RE engines

       Overloaded constants (see the overload manpage) provide a
       simple way to extend the functionality of the RE engine.

       Suppose that we want to enable a new RE escape-sequence
       `\Y|' which matches at boundary between white-space char­
       acters and non-whitespace characters.  Note that
       `(?=\S)(?<!\S)|(?!\S)(?<=\S)' matches exactly at these
       positions, so we want to have each `\Y|' in the place of
       the more complicated version.  We can create a module
       `customre' to do this:

           package customre;
           use overload;

           sub import {
             shift;
             die "No argument to customre::import allowed" if @_;
             overload::constant 'qr' => \&convert;
           }


           my %rules = ( '\\' => '\\',
                         'Y|' => qr/(?=\S)(?<!\S)|(?!\S)(?<=\S)/ );
           sub convert {
             my $re = shift;
             $re =~ s{
                       \\ ( \\ | Y . )
                     }
                     { $rules{$1} or invalid($re,$1) }sgex;
             return $re;
           }

       Now `use customre' enables the new escape in constant reg­
       ular expressions, i.e., those without any runtime variable
       interpolations.  As documented in the overload manpage,
       this conversion will work only over literal parts of regu­
       lar expressions.  For `\Y|$re\Y|' the variable part of
       this regular expression needs to be converted explicitly
       (but only if the special meaning of `\Y|' should be
       enabled inside $re):

           use customre;
           $re = <>;
           chomp $re;
           $re = customre::convert $re;
           /\Y|$re\Y|/;


BUGS

       This document varies from difficult to understand to com­
       pletely and utterly opaque.  The wandering prose riddled
       with jargon is hard to fathom in several places.

       This document needs a rewrite that separates the tutorial
       content from the reference content.


SEE ALSO

       the Regexp Quote-Like Operators entry in the perlop man­
       page.

       the Gory details of parsing quoted constructs entry in the
       perlop manpage.

       the perlfaq6 manpage.

       the pos entry in the perlfunc manpage.

       the perllocale manpage.

       Mastering Regular Expressions by Jeffrey Friedl, published
       by O'Reilly and Associates.


Man(1) output converted with man2html