perlsyn - Perl syntax


DESCRIPTION

       A Perl script consists of a sequence of declarations and
       statements.  The sequence of statements is executed just
       once, unlike in sed and awk scripts, where the sequence of
       statements is executed for each input line.  While this
       means that you must explicitly loop over the lines of your
       input file (or files), it also means you have much more
       control over which files and which lines you look at.
       (Actually, I'm lying--it is possible to do an implicit
       loop with either the -n or -p switch.  It's just not the
       mandatory default like it is in sed and awk.)

       Perl is, for the most part, a free-form language.  (The
       only exception to this is format declarations, for obvious
       reasons.)  Text from a `"#"' character until the end of
       the line is a comment, and is ignored.  If you attempt to
       use `/* */' C-style comments, it will be interpreted
       either as division or pattern matching, depending on the
       context, and C++ `//' comments just look like a null regu­
       lar expression, so don't do that.

       Declarations

       The only things you need to declare in Perl are report
       formats and subroutines--and even undefined subroutines
       can be handled through AUTOLOAD.  A variable holds the
       undefined value (`undef') until it has been assigned a
       defined value, which is anything other than `undef'.  When
       used as a number, `undef' is treated as `0'; when used as
       a string, it is treated the empty string, `""'; and when
       used as a reference that isn't being assigned to, it is
       treated as an error.  If you enable warnings, you'll be
       notified of an uninitialized value whenever you treat
       `undef' as a string or a number.  Well, usually.  Boolean
       ("don't-care") contexts and operators such as `++', `--',
       `+=', `-=', and `.=' are always exempt from such warnings.

       A declaration can be put anywhere a statement can, but has
       no effect on the execution of the primary sequence of
       statements--declarations all take effect at compile time.
       Typically all the declarations are put at the beginning or
       the end of the script.  However, if you're using lexi­
       cally-scoped private variables created with `my()', you'll
       have to make sure your format or subroutine definition is
       within the same block scope as the my if you expect to be
       able to access those private variables.

       Declaring a subroutine allows a subroutine name to be used
       as if it were a list operator from that point forward in
       the program.  You can declare a subroutine without defin­
       ing it by saying `sub name', thus:

           $me = myname $0             or die "can't get myname";

       Note that my() functions as a list operator, not as a
       unary operator; so be careful to use `or' instead of `||'
       in this case.  However, if you were to declare the subrou­
       tine as `sub myname ($)', then `myname' would function as
       a unary operator, so either `or' or `||' would work.

       Subroutines declarations can also be loaded up with the
       `require' statement or both loaded and imported into your
       namespace with a `use' statement.  See the perlmod manpage
       for details on this.

       A statement sequence may contain declarations of lexi­
       cally-scoped variables, but apart from declaring a vari­
       able name, the declaration acts like an ordinary state­
       ment, and is elaborated within the sequence of statements
       as if it were an ordinary statement.  That means it actu­
       ally has both compile-time and run-time effects.

       Simple statements

       The only kind of simple statement is an expression evalu­
       ated for its side effects.  Every simple statement must be
       terminated with a semicolon, unless it is the final state­
       ment in a block, in which case the semicolon is optional.
       (A semicolon is still encouraged there if the block takes
       up more than one line, because you may eventually add
       another line.)  Note that there are some operators like
       `eval {}' and `do {}' that look like compound statements,
       but aren't (they're just TERMs in an expression), and thus
       need an explicit termination if used as the last item in a
       statement.

       Any simple statement may optionally be followed by a SIN­
       GLE modifier, just before the terminating semicolon (or
       block ending).  The possible modifiers are:

           if EXPR
           unless EXPR
           while EXPR
           until EXPR
           foreach EXPR

       The `if' and `unless' modifiers have the expected seman­
       tics, presuming you're a speaker of English.  The `fore­
       ach' modifier is an iterator:  For each value in EXPR, it
       aliases `$_' to the value and executes the statement.  The
       `while' and `until' modifiers have the usual "`while'
       loop" semantics (conditional evaluated first), except when
       applied to a `do'-BLOCK (or to the deprecated `do'-SUBROU­
       TINE statement), in which case the block executes once
       before the conditional is evaluated.  This is so that you


           do {
               $line = <STDIN>;
               ...
           } until $line  eq ".\n";

       See the do entry in the perlfunc manpage.  Note also that
       the loop control statements described later will NOT work
       in this construct, because modifiers don't take loop
       labels.  Sorry.  You can always put another block inside
       of it (for `next') or around it (for `last') to do that
       sort of thing.  For `next', just double the braces:

           do {{
               next if $x == $y;
               # do something here
           }} until $x++ > $z;

       For `last', you have to be more elaborate:

           LOOP: {
                   do {
                       last if $x = $y**2;
                       # do something here
                   } while $x++ <= $z;
           }

       Compound statements

       In Perl, a sequence of statements that defines a scope is
       called a block.  Sometimes a block is delimited by the
       file containing it (in the case of a required file, or the
       program as a whole), and sometimes a block is delimited by
       the extent of a string (in the case of an eval).

       But generally, a block is delimited by curly brackets,
       also known as braces.  We will call this syntactic con­
       struct a BLOCK.

       The following compound statements may be used to control
       flow:

           if (EXPR) BLOCK
           if (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
           if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
           LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK
           LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
           LABEL for (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
           LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK
           LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
           LABEL BLOCK continue BLOCK

       of BLOCKs, not statements.  This means that the curly
       brackets are required--no dangling statements allowed.  If
       you want to write conditionals without curly brackets
       there are several other ways to do it.  The following all
       do the same thing:

           if (!open(FOO)) { die "Can't open $FOO: $!"; }
           die "Can't open $FOO: $!" unless open(FOO);
           open(FOO) or die "Can't open $FOO: $!";     # FOO or bust!
           open(FOO) ? 'hi mom' : die "Can't open $FOO: $!";
                               # a bit exotic, that last one

       The `if' statement is straightforward.  Because BLOCKs are
       always bounded by curly brackets, there is never any ambi­
       guity about which `if' an `else' goes with.  If you use
       `unless' in place of `if', the sense of the test is
       reversed.

       The `while' statement executes the block as long as the
       expression is true (does not evaluate to the null string
       `""' or `0' or `"0"').  The LABEL is optional, and if pre­
       sent, consists of an identifier followed by a colon.  The
       LABEL identifies the loop for the loop control statements
       `next', `last', and `redo'.  If the LABEL is omitted, the
       loop control statement refers to the innermost enclosing
       loop.  This may include dynamically looking back your
       call-stack at run time to find the LABEL.  Such desperate
       behavior triggers a warning if you use the `use warnings'
       praga or the -w flag.  Unlike a `foreach' statement, a
       `while' statement never implicitly localises any vari­
       ables.

       If there is a `continue' BLOCK, it is always executed just
       before the conditional is about to be evaluated again,
       just like the third part of a `for' loop in C.  Thus it
       can be used to increment a loop variable, even when the
       loop has been continued via the `next' statement (which is
       similar to the C `continue' statement).

       Loop Control

       The `next' command is like the `continue' statement in C;
       it starts the next iteration of the loop:

           LINE: while (<STDIN>) {
               next LINE if /^#/;      # discard comments
               ...
           }

       The `last' command is like the `break' statement in C (as
       used in loops); it immediately exits the loop in question.
       The `continue' block, if any, is not executed:

               last LINE if /^$/;      # exit when done with header
               ...
           }

       The `redo' command restarts the loop block without evalu­
       ating the conditional again.  The `continue' block, if
       any, is not executed.  This command is normally used by
       programs that want to lie to themselves about what was
       just input.

       For example, when processing a file like /etc/termcap.  If
       your input lines might end in backslashes to indicate con­
       tinuation, you want to skip ahead and get the next record.

           while (<>) {
               chomp;
               if (s/\\$//) {
                   $_ .= <>;
                   redo unless eof();
               }
               # now process $_
           }

       which is Perl short-hand for the more explicitly written
       version:

           LINE: while (defined($line = <ARGV>)) {
               chomp($line);
               if ($line =~ s/\\$//) {
                   $line .= <ARGV>;
                   redo LINE unless eof(); # not eof(ARGV)!
               }
               # now process $line
           }

       Note that if there were a `continue' block on the above
       code, it would get executed even on discarded lines.  This
       is often used to reset line counters or `?pat?' one-time
       matches.

           # inspired by :1,$g/fred/s//WILMA/
           while (<>) {
               ?(fred)?    && s//WILMA $1 WILMA/;
               ?(barney)?  && s//BETTY $1 BETTY/;
               ?(homer)?   && s//MARGE $1 MARGE/;
           } continue {
               print "$ARGV $.: $_";
               close ARGV  if eof();           # reset $.
               reset       if eof();           # reset ?pat?
           }

       If the word `while' is replaced by the word `until', the
       sense of the test is reversed, but the conditional is


       The loop control statements don't work in an `if' or
       `unless', since they aren't loops.  You can double the
       braces to make them such, though.

           if (/pattern/) {{
               next if /fred/;
               next if /barney/;
               # so something here
           }}

       The form `while/if BLOCK BLOCK', available in Perl 4, is
       no longer available.   Replace any occurrence of `if
       BLOCK' by `if (do BLOCK)'.

       For Loops

       Perl's C-style `for' loop works exactly like the corre­
       sponding `while' loop; that means that this:

           for ($i = 1; $i < 10; $i++) {
               ...
           }

       is the same as this:

           $i = 1;
           while ($i < 10) {
               ...
           } continue {
               $i++;
           }

       (There is one minor difference: The first form implies a
       lexical scope for variables declared with `my' in the ini­
       tialization expression.)

       Besides the normal array index looping, `for' can lend
       itself to many other interesting applications.  Here's one
       that avoids the problem you get into if you explicitly
       test for end-of-file on an interactive file descriptor
       causing your program to appear to hang.

           $on_a_tty = -t STDIN && -t STDOUT;
           sub prompt { print "yes? " if $on_a_tty }
           for ( prompt(); <STDIN>; prompt() ) {
               # do something
           }


       The `foreach' loop iterates over a normal list value and
       sets the variable VAR to be each element of the list in
       turn.  If the variable is preceded with the keyword `my',
       then it is lexically scoped, and is therefore visible only
       within the loop.  Otherwise, the variable is implicitly
       local to the loop and regains its former value upon exit­
       ing the loop.  If the variable was previously declared
       with `my', it uses that variable instead of the global
       one, but it's still localized to the loop.

       The `foreach' keyword is actually a synonym for the `for'
       keyword, so you can use `foreach' for readability or `for'
       for brevity.  (Or because the Bourne shell is more famil­
       iar to you than csh, so writing `for' comes more natu­
       rally.)  If VAR is omitted, `$_' is set to each value.  If
       any element of LIST is an lvalue, you can modify it by
       modifying VAR inside the loop.  That's because the `fore­
       ach' loop index variable is an implicit alias for each
       item in the list that you're looping over.

       If any part of LIST is an array, `foreach' will get very
       confused if you add or remove elements within the loop
       body, for example with `splice'.   So don't do that.

       `foreach' probably won't do what you expect if VAR is a
       tied or other special variable.   Don't do that either.

       Examples:

           for (@ary) { s/foo/bar/ }

           for my $elem (@elements) {
               $elem *= 2;
           }

           for $count (10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,'BOOM') {
               print $count, "\n"; sleep(1);
           }

           for (1..15) { print "Merry Christmas\n"; }

           foreach $item (split(/:[\\\n:]*/, $ENV{TERMCAP})) {
               print "Item: $item\n";
           }

       Here's how a C programmer might code up a particular algo­
       rithm in Perl:

               for (my $j = 0; $j < @ary2; $j++) {
                   if ($ary1[$i] > $ary2[$j]) {
                       last; # can't go to outer :-(
                   }
                   $ary1[$i] += $ary2[$j];
               }
               # this is where that last takes me
           }

       Whereas here's how a Perl programmer more comfortable with
       the idiom might do it:

           OUTER: for my $wid (@ary1) {
           INNER:   for my $jet (@ary2) {
                       next OUTER if $wid > $jet;
                       $wid += $jet;
                    }
                 }

       See how much easier this is?  It's cleaner, safer, and
       faster.  It's cleaner because it's less noisy.  It's safer
       because if code gets added between the inner and outer
       loops later on, the new code won't be accidentally exe­
       cuted.  The `next' explicitly iterates the other loop
       rather than merely terminating the inner one.  And it's
       faster because Perl executes a `foreach' statement more
       rapidly than it would the equivalent `for' loop.

       Basic BLOCKs and Switch Statements

       A BLOCK by itself (labeled or not) is semantically equiva­
       lent to a loop that executes once.  Thus you can use any
       of the loop control statements in it to leave or restart
       the block.  (Note that this is NOT true in `eval{}',
       `sub{}', or contrary to popular belief `do{}' blocks,
       which do NOT count as loops.)  The `continue' block is
       optional.

       The BLOCK construct is particularly nice for doing case
       structures.

           SWITCH: {
               if (/^abc/) { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; }
               if (/^def/) { $def = 1; last SWITCH; }
               if (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; }
               $nothing = 1;
           }

       There is no official `switch' statement in Perl, because
       there are already several ways to write the equivalent.
       In addition to the above, you could write

               $abc = 1, last SWITCH  if /^abc/;
               $def = 1, last SWITCH  if /^def/;
               $xyz = 1, last SWITCH  if /^xyz/;
               $nothing = 1;
           }

       (That's actually not as strange as it looks once you real­
       ize that you can use loop control "operators" within an
       expression,  That's just the normal C comma operator.)

       or

           SWITCH: {
               /^abc/ && do { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; };
               /^def/ && do { $def = 1; last SWITCH; };
               /^xyz/ && do { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; };
               $nothing = 1;
           }

       or formatted so it stands out more as a "proper" `switch'
       statement:

           SWITCH: {
               /^abc/      && do {
                                   $abc = 1;
                                   last SWITCH;
                              };

               /^def/      && do {
                                   $def = 1;
                                   last SWITCH;
                              };

               /^xyz/      && do {
                                   $xyz = 1;
                                   last SWITCH;
                               };
               $nothing = 1;
           }

       or

           SWITCH: {
               /^abc/ and $abc = 1, last SWITCH;
               /^def/ and $def = 1, last SWITCH;
               /^xyz/ and $xyz = 1, last SWITCH;
               $nothing = 1;
           }

       or even, horrors,

               { $abc = 1 }
           elsif (/^def/)
               { $def = 1 }
           elsif (/^xyz/)
               { $xyz = 1 }
           else
               { $nothing = 1 }

       A common idiom for a `switch' statement is to use `fore­
       ach''s aliasing to make a temporary assignment to `$_' for
       convenient matching:

           SWITCH: for ($where) {
                       /In Card Names/     && do { push @flags, '-e'; last; };
                       /Anywhere/          && do { push @flags, '-h'; last; };
                       /In Rulings/        && do {                    last; };
                       die "unknown value for form variable where: `$where'";
                   }

       Another interesting approach to a switch statement is
       arrange for a `do' block to return the proper value:

           $amode = do {
               if     ($flag & O_RDONLY) { "r" }       # XXX: isn't this 0?
               elsif  ($flag & O_WRONLY) { ($flag & O_APPEND) ? "a" : "w" }
               elsif  ($flag & O_RDWR)   {
                   if ($flag & O_CREAT)  { "w+" }
                   else                  { ($flag & O_APPEND) ? "a+" : "r+" }
               }
           };

       Or

               print do {
                   ($flags & O_WRONLY) ? "write-only"          :
                   ($flags & O_RDWR)   ? "read-write"          :
                                         "read-only";
               };

       Or if you are certainly that all the `&&' clauses are
       true, you can use something like this, which "switches" on
       the value of the `HTTP_USER_AGENT' envariable.

           # pick out jargon file page based on browser
           $dir = 'http://www.wins.uva.nl/~mes/jargon';
           for ($ENV{HTTP_USER_AGENT}) {
               $page  =    /Mac/            && 'm/Macintrash.html'
                        || /Win(dows )?NT/  && 'e/evilandrude.html'
                        || /Win|MSIE|WebTV/ && 'm/MicroslothWindows.html'
                        || /Linux/          && 'l/Linux.html'
                        || /HP-UX/          && 'h/HP-SUX.html'
                        || /SunOS/          && 's/ScumOS.html'
                        ||                     'a/AppendixB.html';
           }
           print "Location: $dir/$page\015\012\015\012";

       That kind of switch statement only works when you know the
       `&&' clauses will be true.  If you don't, the previous
       `?:' example should be used.

       You might also consider writing a hash of subroutine ref­
       erences instead of synthesizing a `switch' statement.

       Goto

       Although not for the faint of heart, Perl does support a
       `goto' statement.  There are three forms: `goto'-LABEL,
       `goto'-EXPR, and `goto'-&NAME.  A loop's LABEL is not
       actually a valid target for a `goto'; it's just the name
       of the loop.

       The `goto'-LABEL form finds the statement labeled with
       LABEL and resumes execution there.  It may not be used to
       go into any construct that requires initialization, such
       as a subroutine or a `foreach' loop.  It also can't be
       used to go into a construct that is optimized away.  It
       can be used to go almost anywhere else within the dynamic
       scope, including out of subroutines, but it's usually bet­
       ter to use some other construct such as `last' or `die'.
       The author of Perl has never felt the need to use this
       form of `goto' (in Perl, that is--C is another matter).

       The `goto'-EXPR form expects a label name, whose scope
       will be resolved dynamically.  This allows for computed
       `goto's per FORTRAN, but isn't necessarily recommended if
       you're optimizing for maintainability:

           goto(("FOO", "BAR", "GLARCH")[$i]);

       The `goto'-&NAME form is highly magical, and substitutes a
       call to the named subroutine for the currently running
       subroutine.  This is used by `AUTOLOAD()' subroutines that
       wish to load another subroutine and then pretend that the
       other subroutine had been called in the first place
       (except that any modifications to `@_' in the current sub­
       routine are propagated to the other subroutine.)  After

       this routine was called first.

       In almost all cases like this, it's usually a far, far
       better idea to use the structured control flow mechanisms
       of `next', `last', or `redo' instead of resorting to a
       `goto'.  For certain applications, the catch and throw
       pair of `eval{}' and die() for exception processing can
       also be a prudent approach.

       PODs: Embedded Documentation

       Perl has a mechanism for intermixing documentation with
       source code.  While it's expecting the beginning of a new
       statement, if the compiler encounters a line that begins
       with an equal sign and a word, like this

           =head1 Here There Be Pods!

       Then that text and all remaining text up through and
       including a line beginning with `=cut' will be ignored.
       The format of the intervening text is described in the
       perlpod manpage.

       This allows you to intermix your source code and your doc­
       umentation text freely, as in

           =item snazzle($)

           The snazzle() function will behave in the most spectacular
           form that you can possibly imagine, not even excepting
           cybernetic pyrotechnics.

           =cut back to the compiler, nuff of this pod stuff!

           sub snazzle($) {
               my $thingie = shift;
               .........
           }

       Note that pod translators should look at only paragraphs
       beginning with a pod directive (it makes parsing easier),
       whereas the compiler actually knows to look for pod
       escapes even in the middle of a paragraph.  This means
       that the following secret stuff will be ignored by both
       the compiler and the translators.

           $a=3;
           =secret stuff
            warn "Neither POD nor CODE!?"
           =cut back
           print "got $a\n";

       You probably shouldn't rely upon the `warn()' being podded

       this regard, and perhaps the compiler will become pickier.

       One may also use pod directives to quickly comment out a
       section of code.

       Plain Old Comments (Not!)

       Much like the C preprocessor, Perl can process line direc­
       tives.  Using this, one can control Perl's idea of file­
       names and line numbers in error or warning messages (espe­
       cially for strings that are processed with `eval()').  The
       syntax for this mechanism is the same as for most C pre­
       processors: it matches the regular expression
       `/^#\s*line\s+(\d+)\s*(?:\s"([^"]+)")?\s*$/' with `$1'
       being the line number for the next line, and `$2' being
       the optional filename (specified within quotes).

       Here are some examples that you should be able to type
       into your command shell:

           % perl
           # line 200 "bzzzt"
           # the `#' on the previous line must be the first char on line
           die 'foo';
           __END__
           foo at bzzzt line 201.

           % perl
           # line 200 "bzzzt"
           eval qq[\n#line 2001 ""\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
           __END__
           foo at - line 2001.

           % perl
           eval qq[\n#line 200 "foo bar"\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
           __END__
           foo at foo bar line 200.

           % perl
           # line 345 "goop"
           eval "\n#line " . __LINE__ . ' "' . __FILE__ ."\"\ndie 'foo'";
           print $@;
           __END__
           foo at goop line 345.


Man(1) output converted with man2html