[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
No Subject
Reply-To: venus_in_pisces@vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Reviews of us
In <324E1062.BDD@sprynet.com>, factory@sprynet.com (grady) writes:
>shooowa.
>
>http://www.excite.com/Subject/Entertainment/Music/
>Styles_A-Z/Rock/s-index.msn.html
thanks.
>Not sure what this means.
me either. more fodder for the faux-poetry engine?
>Calloway has exceeded the mythical 100-post-per-day limit
23. 23 posts per day.
>My ISP doesn't charge me by the message, so fuckit.
dang, you blow my cover, dood.
>He pointed out, too, that there is an austin.music. Yes. It sucks.
yes it does. everything sucks.
>if anybody gives me any shit
>this week, I'm gonna email you a week's worth of austin.music as
>punishment.
's'ok. my isp doesn't charge me by the message.
>They do, however, also have clubowners who post weird wired ranty rants
>in response to other people questioning their cover-charge policies, so
>maybe I shouldn't talk.
what about club owners who post weird wired ranty rants in repsonse to
rhetorical faux questions regarding how shows are cross-booked?
i think you should talk. my news server finally popped up with 93 amch
messages today and i haven't posted in four days. this is good. i like this.
i like line dancin, too.
>WE still better on average.
do they have 93 posts?
this, like line dancin, is a preference, no better, no worse. it seems to serve
people who think it doesn't suck, which everything does anyway. some say,
screw everything that doesn't appear as not-faux to them.
alec,... more?
>Or, as my juice is telling me, MORE JUICY BITS.
o, you're not getting the kind with extra calcium then.
>which, since it's juice, makes no sense to advertise,
tell this to stay free.
>either way, Rebar rock. Eugene Chadbourne was also in fine form.
>During the 17 minutes which I watched, he covered gil scot heron and
>john coltrane. Both on electric banjo.
no kiss covers?
3.2.3