[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Something funny at Lollapalooza . . .
In article <4099gn$17v1@bigblue.oit.unc.edu>, tmorman@email.unc.edu (Todd Morman) says:
>
> [cross-posted to triangle.general]
>
>There was so much interesting stuff happening that day at Walnut Creek,
>but this little incident just *has* to be shared:
>
[snip]
>Oh, yeah, the story: ALE now feels a little defensive, and explains the
>law which makes it illegal for dildos and beer to be in the same arena
>together, as well as the fact that Hardee's will get into trouble for it,
>not the volunteer (point well taken--I'm not objecting to Hardee's Walnut
>Creek trying to obey the stupid laws). The scary thing is that ALE guy
>obviously believes this is a sensible law. He's rambling now, and asks me
>if I was at the Lords of Acid show at the Ritz a few months ago. I was,
>and tell him so. He says, "Well, they had these inflatable dolls hanging
>from the ceiling, with genitals showing, and the Ritz got in trouble for
>it! You want to see the negatives?" He's fumbling in his wallet now; I am
>thoroughly confused, but curious. He pulls out two negatives and holds
>them up to the sky, and--sure enough--there are two inflatable dolls
>caught on film, one male, one female, both naked.
[snip]
The question here is...why did he have these negetives in his wallet?
C
References: