[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: The Limits To Growth



charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew) wrote:

>In article <578hir$tnj@News2.Lakes.com>,
>   gdy52150@prairie.lakes.com (gdy52150@prairie.lakes.com) 
>wrote:
>(BIG CUT)
>>i have to agree with Ken's  overall assement of cancer 
>risk. But for
>>the look at the first enviromental problem of the 21st 
>century start
>>looking at endocrine blockers. The chemicals that pose as 
>endocrines
>>will be a greater problem than ozone depletion and cancer 
>risk
>>combined. There is a fair amount of info available on the 
>wweb, just
>>set your search engine to endocrines.

>Oh, boy!  Here we go with the next catastrophe in the 
>making!  I suppose that fertility rates are falling as a 
>result of these endocrine blockers.  Funny that this would 
>be a problem in an otherwise over-populated world.


ok charlie you have prove your an idiot by associating the only effect
of endocrine blockers with reduced fertility.

>Some of you pessimists remind me of a bunch of sheep, 
>searching for the next story to blindly follow.  Enjoy your 
>pessimism.





References: