[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[SANET-MG] funding organic farmiing research



Farmers' anger over GM's 'undue influence'
The Scotsman, 27 April 2005
http://business.scotsman.com/agriculture.cfm?id=448022005

A LEADING organic farming lobby organisation has accused a
government-backed advisory body of being overly influenced by
heavyweight biotechnology companies in supporting more tax payer funded
research into genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The Soil Association says that about £100 million of public funds are
spent annually on agricultural biotechnology research in the UK against
only about £2m into organic farming, in spite of sales now topping £1
billion a year.

It says this will be compounded by a new report to be published tomorrow
by the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC), an
independent body set up by the government.

It dismisses the commission's initial analysis of the drivers for GMO
research as failing to examine the concerns on environmental, health and
socio-economic impacts as well as leaving huge gaps in the field of
impacts of GM at sell/plant level.

"If the AEBC is investigating the drivers of the GM research agendas, it
must produce answers to why these gaps exist, which its initial analysis
does not," says Gundula Azeez, the Soil Association's policy manager.

She says the AEBC had failed to address the informal pressures compared
with official and positive drivers, particularly those from the GM
companies, and claims the former were probably more important.

"Commercial interests are very powerful," she says. "Not only do they
have a high presence on the boards of the research councils that decide
research agendas ... but they have unique access to the farming
community, the farming media and the scientific community."

She claims that the public, NGOs and the government did not have this
same degree of influence and, in particular, the Soil Association had
found it very difficult to gets its message out to wider audiences.

"It is absolutely incredible that, eight years after GMOs were
introduced into the food chain and despite the massive public disquiet
expressed over and over again, there has been no effort to research the
health impacts."

She goes on to accuse GM companies of encouraging an atmosphere among
researchers who oppose pro-GM messages.

"Fear of the inevitable hostility to any unwelcome findings is coupled
with fear of even approaching the boards of research councils with such
proposals."

She points out that while Defra funds organic farming research with an
annual budget of £2 million, under the organic action plan a further
£5 million was due to be provided under the LINK programme. "But the
requirement for industry matching funding meant that projects could only
be found to spend half the funds."

The AEBC is shortly to be wound up following a government review of its
operations. Industry sources on both sides of the GM fence found it was
unable to produce a meaningful consensus of opinion due to the widely
diverging opinions of its membership.

********************************************************
To unsubscribe from SANET-MG:
1- Visit http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html to unsubscribe or;
2- Send a message to <listserv@sare.org> from the address subscribed to the list. Type "unsubscribe sanet-mg" in the body of the message.

Visit the SANET-MG archives at: http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html
For more information on grants and other resources available through the SARE program, please visit http://www.sare.org.