# [SANET-MG] why is p=.o5 significant?

```Hi Edna,
```
You are correct the m value is the mean of the proportion of male births. The P value is related to the probability that a deviation from the expected M=0.500 by chance , a a value p=0.05 is taken to be statistically significant , while lower values are considered to be even more significant. By normal convention the values reported such as .006 and .008 are agreed to be significant. The p value .05 was proposed to be significant by the great population geneticist RA Fisher from Oxford., who with Sewall Wright and JBS Haldane founded population genetics. I am tempted to bore everyone with my meeting with RA Fisher in 1962 but that does not add much to the question. I am enclosing below a fuller discussion of of p 05 as a convention for significance of data and the open sesame to the PhD exam :-)
```http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/p05.htm
Why P=0.05?
```
he standard level of significance used to justify a claim of a statistically significant effect is 0.05. For better or worse, the term statistically significant has become synonymous with P0.05.
```
```
There are many theories and stories to account for the use of P=0.05 to denote statistical significance. All of them trace the practice back to the influence of R.A. Fisher. In 1914, Karl Pearson published his Tables for Statisticians & Biometricians. For each distribution, Pearson gave the value of P for a series of values of the random variable. When Fisher published Statistical Methods for Research Workers (SMRW) in 1925, he included tables that gave the value of the random variable for specially selected values of P. SMRW was a major influence through the 1950s. The same approach was taken for Fisher's Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural, and Medical Research, published in 1938 with Frank Yates. Even today, Fisher's tables are widely reproduced in standard statistical texts.
```
```
Fisher's tables were compact. Where Pearson described a distribution in detail, Fisher summarized it in a single line in one of his tables making them more suitable for inclusion in standard reference works*. However, Fisher's tables would change the way the information could be used. While Pearson's tables provide probabilities for a wide range of values of a statistic, Fisher's tables only bracket the probabilities between coarse bounds.
```
```
The impact of Fisher's tables was profound. Through the 1960s, it was standard practice in many fields to report summaries with one star attached to indicate P 0.05 and two stars to indicate P 0.01, Occasionally, three starts were used to indicate P 0.001.
```
```
Still, why should the value 0.05 be adopted as the universally accepted value for statistical significance? Why has this approach to hypothesis testing not been supplanted in the intervening three-quarters of a century?
```
```
It was Fisher who suggested giving 0.05 its special status. Page 44 of the 13th edition of SMRW, describing the standard normal distribution, states
```
```
The value for which P=0.05, or 1 in 20, is 1.96 or nearly 2; it is convenient to take this point as a limit in judging whether a deviation ought to be considered significant or not. Deviations exceeding twice the standard deviation are thus formally regarded as significant. Using this criterion we should be led to follow up a false indication only once in 22 trials, even if the statistics were the only guide available. Small effects will still escape notice if the data are insufficiently numerous to bring them out, but no lowering of the standard of significance would meet this difficulty.
```
Similar remarks can be found in Fisher (1926, 504).

********************************************************
To unsubscribe from SANET-MG:
1- Visit http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html to unsubscribe or;
2- Send a message to <listserv@sare.org> from the address subscribed to the list. Type "unsubscribe sanet-mg" in the body of the message.

Visit the SANET-MG archives at: http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html.