[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [compost_tea] Vegetable quality



William,

 

Thanks for asking the question, it sure got me stirred up. I’m struggling through Reams work and have ordered my Brix meter today. It seems clear that there are lots of standards that reflect quality as you describe it. Reams indicates higher Brix readings indicate disease resistance…this will be interesting!

 

Tom Jaszewski

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: William Kruidenier [mailto:williamk@carolina.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:31 AM
To: compost_tea@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [compost_tea] Vegetable quality

 

One thing I would love to see entered into the "giant vegetable"
discussion vis-a-vis compost tea is vegetable quality. It seems that
produce quality (vitamin, mineral, sugar = taste, etc.) gets
forgotten in the discussion. After all, the purpose of food is to
sustain the human body, and the best produce will do the best job of
feeding the body what it needs. Therefore, I'm curious on two fronts:

1. Documentation of the impact of CT on fruit/veg quality

2. Documentation that bigger fruits/veggies are necessarily a better
quality than smaller

By "quality" I mean higher vitamin and mineral content. The best
quick test seems to be Brix readings, but what other documentation is
available? It seems the organic growing industry harps more on the
ABSENCE of dangerous substances (chemicals) than the PRESENCE of
helpful substances (vit/min/sugars). I'm assuming that CT makes
better veggies which is why I use it. But I wonder how much testing
has been done to prove it?

William K.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
compost_tea-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
compost_tea-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.