Hi,
The concept of paying to belong to something
where I do not have a clear path for my voice is of concern, I see nothing on
the site or in the index of things to come relating to how and with what
authority this group will represent the international views of compost tea
users.
purpose 1;
To provide a unified voice that represents the best interests of the
compost tea industry and ensures its safe and successful
continuation.
To provide a unified voice their needs to be a
clearly visible path for views and debate then decision
making-- the site tells me about membership fees and benefits (????) none of
which relate to a path of unified voice.
I suggest the current discussion group has a clear
and strong INTERNATIONAL VOICE and the work last year on the NOP made this clear
and strong.
The true strength of a fledging industry is often
its many voices not its single voice especially when it has a considerable
foe.
International??--visit the site and count the
nations named?
Take alook at this group and count the nations on any given day?
The second paragraph of the vision is again being
met here .
I AM NOT WISHING TO POUR COLD WATER ON THIS
PROJECT---
I BELIEVE WE JUST NEED A GREAT DEAL OF CLARITY ON
WHO IS CLAIMING THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ON OUR BEHALF --HAVE US PAY FOR IT--
WHEN WE ARE SMALL AND DIVERSE.
the TERMS INCORPORATED AND COUNCIL
NORMALLY COME WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS--CAN WE SEE SOME?
REGARDS
Bill Quinn
New Zealand.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: compost_tea-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |